To: OrthodoxPresbyterian; Tantumergo; Canticle_of_Deborah
So...no tomb is attributed to Mary the mother of Jesus? How interesting.
OP, this sort of posting is really unworthy of you.
50 posted on
11/23/2003 2:55:56 PM PST by
Romulus
(Nothing really good ever happened after 1789.)
To: Romulus
The most obvious and logical answer is that those inscriptions identified the deceased as followers of Christ and the apostles/disciples mentioned.
The second possibility is that some not so nice person perpetrated a hoax centuries ago to discredit the Church and Scripture.
A simple analysis of Scripture by those who pretend to be experts would reveal the inconsistencies in this article.
53 posted on
11/23/2003 5:27:30 PM PST by
Canticle_of_Deborah
(National health care gives the government the means to kill you when you become too expensive)
To: Romulus
So...no tomb is attributed to Mary the mother of Jesus? How interesting. OP, this sort of posting is really unworthy of you.Unworthy?
I posted an Article from the Jerusalem Christian Review, one of the leading Christian News publications in Jerusalem (endorsed by Ronald Reagan, I note as a trivia item), along with a supporting essay from the "Sword of the Spirit" website (properly linked).
Members of the Roman Catholic Caucus are finding the Article to be of interest and are responding vigorously and thoughtfully (well, some -- dangus, Hermann, yourself -- are responding thoughtfully, anyway).
That doesn't seem like a crime to me. ;-)
64 posted on
11/24/2003 3:36:26 AM PST by
OrthodoxPresbyterian
(We are Unworthy Servants; We have only done Our Duty)
To: Romulus
"The easiest thing of all is to deceive one's self; for what a man wishes he generally believes to be true."
Demosthenes
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson