[Hermann the Cherusker]

I'm as lost as FL here. I don't see any mention of a human body no matter how hard I look. Whatever are you talkign about? Please speak plainly and stop quizzing us.

[FormerLib]

This isn't Scripture, Hermann, it's "Three-Card Monty."

By winding a person through this process, they lead you down a path of deceit. It is because of this that he just can't say what he means. Revealed too quickly, and the bizarre interpretation would fall flat on its illogical (perhaps heretical) face.

Why else would they have to play the game in such a way, plucking lines out of context to build their house of cards?

[Alex Murphy]

"I don't see any mention of a human body no matter how hard I look"

Ah ah ah - no comments from the audience, please, unless FormerLib wishes to use you as one of his lifelines.

[FormerLib]

I don't see any mention of a human body no matter how hard I look.

Geez, I hope he isn't going to try to do something as mindless as try to claim that as proof that we shouldn't be eating a human body at the Eucharist ("As if" as the kids say nowadays). Don't these people understand anything about the Christian faith?

I think our sandals are getting dusty, what about you?

[conservonator]

Unless I have suddenly lost my ability to detect a poorly constructed YOPIOS trap, I believe he is trying to state that since human flesh is not specifically mentioned in the Acts 11 reference, it is by omission, still consider "unclean". But I guess that means that shellfish, and other kinds of fish are still verboten.

Apparently he believes that Christ was inducing us to sin by commanding us to eat His flesh and drink His blood.