Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Flying Circus
***I understand that your own novel interpretation of scripture puts Mary dead in her grave***

That is not my view.

My objections were:

[1] to the title Blessed Mother (she is blessed and a mother, but the title has no biblical basis)

[2] to taking a singluar past statement and extrapolating a present function, without any scriptural warrant.
27 posted on 12/15/2003 4:22:27 PM PST by drstevej (Exurge, Calvinisti, et judica causam tuam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: drstevej
(she is blessed and a mother, but the title has no biblical basis)

Huh??? Have ever bothered to read the first chapter of Luke?

to taking a singluar past statement and extrapolating a present function, without any scriptural warrant.

You choose to ignore the context of the Bible and apply your own novel interpretation of it so I can understand your blindness the deeper meanings in the wedding at Cana. I suggest you spend some time prayerfully contemplating the narrative of wedding at Cana, and it's place in the Gospel account.

28 posted on 12/15/2003 4:55:18 PM PST by Flying Circus (As you do pray, so you do believe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: drstevej
[1] to the title Blessed Mother (she is blessed and a mother, but the title has no biblical basis)

"all generations shall call me blessed."

2] to taking a singluar past statement and extrapolating a present function, without any scriptural warrant.

If the Bible is all we have (i.e. Tradition means nothing), then is it possible to place too much emphasis on a "singular past statement" , in the Gospel, no less?

29 posted on 12/15/2003 5:05:39 PM PST by old and tired
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson