Leave it to the Catholics to cast doubt on scripture. I've heard the above words out of atheists.
A study of early Christian history shows that there was a considerable disagreement among Christians until the issue of the canon was finally settled. Some early Christians said the book of Revelation didnt belong in the canon. Others said Pope Clements Letter to the Corinthians (written circa A.D. 80) and The Shepherd, an early second-century allegory written by a Christian writer named Hermas did belong in the New Testament. How do you handle that?"
"We know by examining the contents of the books. Some bookslike 1 Corinthians and Revelationobviously belong. Otherslike Clements Letter to the Corinthiansobviously dont."
"But is it really so obvious? Tell me, what is so obvious in Philemon to indicate that it is inspired? And what is so obviously unorthodox in The Shepherd or the Didache or Clements letter or any of the other first- and second-century Christian writings? Youve never even seen the autographs (originals) of the 27 books in the New Testament. Nobody today has. The earliest copies of those books we possess are centuries newer than the originals. Like it or not, you have to take the say-so of the Catholic Church that in fact those copies are accurate, as well as her decision that those 27 books are the inspired canonical New Testament Scriptures. You do accept her testimony as trustworthy, or else your Protestant Bible would not have those 27 books.
Leave it to the Catholics to cast doubt on scripture. I've heard the above words out of atheists.
It's true though. None of the gospels were signed by their authors. Thus, we do not know who wrote them. Naming the gospels came later.