Donate Here By Secure Server
Posted on 04/07/2004 10:39:21 AM PDT by johnb2004
On April 6, 2004, Bishop Fabian W. Bruskewitz, D.D., S.T.D., of the Lincoln, Ne. diocese, stated through his office to this writer that his diocese would deny Holy Communion to any manifest, persistent, obstinate sinner.
Referring to canon 915, Bruskewitz said, "We agree completely with Archbishop Raymond Burke in the action he has taken and we would take the same action in the diocese of Lincoln with regard to manifest, persistent, obstinate sinners, including politicians, regardless of which diocese they are from."
Bishop Bruskewitz of Lincoln in May 15, 1996 issued a successful diocesan synodal law, still enforced today, which carries an automatic penalty of excommunication. Informing all Catholics in his diocese of the list of dissenting organizations whose activities are contrary to the Catholic Faith, Bruskewitz has literally 'cleaned house.' Until today, however, it was unknown if he would deny the Eucharist to any manifest, persistent, obstinate sinner.
Bruskewitz's Vicar General, Monsignor Timothy J. Thorburn, J.C.L., addressed my question of whether this applied to legislators from other dioceses who were manifestly pro abortion, saying it's best for ministers to err on the side of reverence of the Eucharist, "If I had denied Holy Communion to someone who is known to be manifest, persistent, and obstinate in his sin and he later demonstrates that he had, in fact, publicly denied his promotion of, say, abortion, I then would publicly apologize to him."
On January 8, 2004, Archbishop Raymond Burke, then bishop of La Crosse, promulgated a diocesan 'canonical notification' based on canon 915, saying, "No good bishops could stand by and let this happen. These public legislators are in grave sin." Burke said he would deny Kerry Communion because Kerry's conduct is seriously, clearly and steadfastly contrary to the moral norm (EE n.37). Kerry's own Archbishop, Sean O'Malley, said he wouldn't go that far and would give Kerry the Eucharist.
All ministers of the Eucharist must deny Communion to pro abortion legislators as they are ecclesiastically bound to obey Church law, regardless of whether their bishop or pastor does or does not obey. In fact, canon 915 places the responsibility on the minister — 'ne admittantur' — who, in some canonists' opinion, could be punished themselves according to canon 1389 §2, should he unlawfully administer the sacrament with the consequent danger of scandal.
Of the 195 U.S. diocesan bishops, all except two still refuse to say they would deny the Eucharist to manifest, persistent, obstinate sinners. In doing so, these bishops are disregarding the clearly defined canons of the Church.
The responsibility to issue canonical sanctions against Catholic politicians who support abortion rests with each individual bishop over his diocesan politicians. And, the Pope has the authority to issue a worldwide decree forbidding Holy Communion to manifest, obstinate, persistent sinners under canon 915 until they publicly repent (canon 915 is a sacramental law and applies only to the Eucharist and not to any other sacrament).
It is not within the authority of the United State Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) to do this as a conference. But they can and should issue, as a conference, important statements at their June 2004 meeting regarding this national scandal.
But, wait! The Bishops will not be holding their semiannual plenary meeting June 2004, a meeting which would normally be very important just months before one of the most crucial U.S. presidential elections in modern time. They, instead, will be having a 'closed retreat meeting' at a still undisclosed location, and the world's Catholic and secular press, and the usual visitors and observers will not be allowed in. Hmmm.
What will it finally take for most of us to stand up and say we're not going to accept this abuse any longer? Faithful Catholics shouldn't have to tolerate this Eucharistic scandal anymore. Why do we Catholics not stand and fight this disobedience, not only by politicians but by the bishops for their lack of discipline. What will it take for us to finally get 'mad?'
If you are scandalized by your state and federal 'Catholic' pro abortion legislators who arrogantly 'in your face' march up to the altar for sacrilegious Communions while using the media to publicly gain acceptance for such 'choices' as abortion, birth control, premarital sex, easy divorce, cohabitation, euthanasia, then I suggest we all follow the lead of Paddy Chayefsky's raging character Howard Beale who told his TV news viewers:
"I want you to get up right now. Get up. Go to your windows, open your windows, and stick your head out, and yell, 'I'm mad as hell and I'm not going to take this anymore!' Things have got to change my friends. You've got to get mad. You've got to say, 'I'm as mad as hell and I'm not going to take this anymore!'"
If you're 'mad as hell,' write to your own bishop now — today — imploring him to follow Archbishop Burke and Bishop Bruskewitz's canonically correct actions. Ask your bishop why he is not obeying the Vatican's Doctrinal Note. Then write your bishop again next week, and the week after that. This is effective lobbying. Remember, Archbishop Burke said that the most compelling reason that lead him to issue a 'canonical notification' against the legislators was the many letters, faxes, emails and phone calls he received from his flock who were greatly scandalized by the politicians' sacrilegious Communions.
Another important lobby to activate would be to 'blow the whistle' on any Catholic legislators in your parishes who are manifest, persistent and obstinate in their sin while scornfully rejecting Church teachings by receiving sacrilegious Communion.
To help you do this, Chuck Wilson, Executive Director of St. Joseph Foundation, San Antonio, Tx. an independent apostolate comprised of canonical lawyers and advisors, has prepared a 'generic denunciation package,' which is something like those 'do it yourself' legal forms that we see on the magazine racks at the supermarket. It is available free of charge (with no obligation on your part) to anyone who wishes to denounce a politician to his bishop, who has the power to do something.
It would be up to the individual (cosigners are also encouraged) to collect the evidence, but the simple package makes that preparation easier. Contact Chuck to email you your 'generic denunciation package' at: CWilson@St-Joseph-Foundation.org.
Send your package to the bishop and a copy to His Eminence Giovanni Battista Cardinal Re, Congregation for Bishops, Piazza Pio XII 10, 00193, Rome, Italy. If the bishop decides to do nothing, then the responsibility remains with him and with Rome.
"The lay faithful have been assigned the task of imbuing and perfecting the temporal order with the spirit of the Gospel. There is no question that the temporal order in the United States would benefit greatly if the faithful diligently pursue and accomplish this mission," said Chuck Wilson.
It is most appropriate for faithful Catholics to give public display of their loyalty to the Church. Let's stay 'mad as hell,' lobby our bishops and Rome, every week if necessary, until the scandalizing sacrilegious Holy Communions are stopped. It shouldn't have to be this way, but it is. These times offer tremendous opportunities for grace from our apostolates.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Barbara Kralis, the article's author, writes for various Christian and conservative publications. She is a regular columnist at RenewAmerica.us, Catholic Online.com, The Wanderer newspaper, New Oxford Review Magazine, Washington Dispatch, MichNews, Catholic Citizens of Illinois, Phil Brennan's WOW, ChronWatch, etc. Her first journalism position was with Boston Herald Traveler, 1964. Barbara published/edited 'Semper Fidelis' Catholic print newsletter. She and her husband, Mitch, live in the great State of Texas, and co-direct the Jesus Through Mary Catholic Foundation. She can be reached at: Avemaria@earthlink.net.
Clearly, that is what is needed. Otherwise we will have high profile cafeteria catholics shopping for cafeteria dioceses for their pr stunts. Anything short of that just creates more scandal and confusion.
We need a one-size-fits-all policy that is clear and unmistakable.
But if Rome does issue a binding directive, there will be backlash which they doubtless wish to avoid.
In the Old Testament God would spare that horrible town if ten good men could be found.
Well in Burke and Bruskewitz(sp?) we have two.
Kerry's father was Jewish and his mother a Boston Brahmin. He's spent his whole life trying to turn into another JFK. He's no more Catholic than Teddy.
Kerry's own Archbishop, Sean O'Malley, said he wouldn't go that far and would give Kerry the Eucharist.
Then that settles it. Kerry should stay home for Easter with the reassurance that he can be videotaped receiving the Eucharist on Easter Sunday in his own diocese.
Nebraska is a safe Republican state. Kerry won't go there to campaign.
I would argue Canon 1367 also applies to the ministers of the Eucharist, as Christ clearly taught on "throwing pearls to swines". And priests who give Holy Communion to Kerry should take a close look at this.
Can. 1367 One who throws away the consecrated species or, for a sacrilegious purpose, takes them away or keeps them, incurs a latae sententiae excommunication reserved to the Apostolic See; a cleric, moreover, may be punished with some other penalty, not excluding dismissal from the clerical state.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.