Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bishop Untener dies at 66
National Catholic Reporter ^ | April 9, 2004 | ROBERT J. McCLORY

Posted on 04/10/2004 12:09:26 PM PDT by Maximilian

Bishop Kenneth Untener, who led the Saginaw, Mich., diocese for 24 years... died March 27 at the Immaculate Heart of Mary Infirmary in Monroe, Mich., of a form of leukemia. He was 66.

“The posture we take toward the world, toward our own people, the images we present … tend toward corporate severity rather than softness. It is like a prevailing wind always moving us in that direction, and I worry about it.” It is clear now that almost everything he did and tried to do in his 24 years as bishop of Saginaw was against that wind.

“He was one of the few bishops for all those alienated women in the church and for liberal Catholics,” said Jesuit Fr. Thomas Reese, editor of America magazine.

[Snipped: praise from the most infamous dissenters such as Sr. Theresa Kane, Bishop Thomas Gumbleton and Bishop Joseph Imesch.]

Three years later, in 1980, at the age of 44, he was named bishop of Saginaw, Mich., a sprawling 11-county, 110-parish diocese in the middle of the state. It was then that Untener faced a crisis that served to define his approach to his job. The appointment was very nearly rescinded due to controversy over a sexuality workshop he had authorized at St. John’s. It included talks by psychologists and other outside experts and films aimed at helping seminarians relate to their own sexuality. But it offended certain Catholics who had secretly filmed some sessions. They filed complaints with the Vatican, charging Untener with promoting “promiscuity.”

Twice during an 11-day period just before his scheduled consecration, Untener flew back and forth across the Atlantic to Rome to defend his position; on the second trip he was accompanied by Detroit Cardinal John Dearden, who assured Pope John Paul II of Untener’s integrity and warned that a cancellation of the consecration would be an embarrassment for the whole church.

He was consecrated bishop on Nov. 24, 1980, afterward greeting a mass of friends and supporters at the Detroit Civic Center with the oft-remembered words: “Hello, I am Ken and I am going to be your waiter.”

... He was very explicit, however, in disagreeing with the church’s refusal to reconsider the ban on artificial contraception. At a meeting of the U.S. bishops in 1990 he commented on a new document dealing with sex education: “We briefly restate the teaching on birth control and say we hope that the logic expressed here is compelling to the Catholic laity. I wonder how we can claim credibility when we make a statement like that, knowing in fact that the logic is not compelling to the Catholic laity … not compelling to many priests … and not compelling to many bishops."

(Excerpt) Read more at ncronline.org ...


TOPICS: Current Events; Moral Issues; Theology
KEYWORDS: apostate; appointment; bishop
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

1 posted on 04/10/2004 12:09:26 PM PDT by Maximilian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Diago; narses; Loyalist; BlackElk; american colleen; saradippity; Polycarp; Dajjal; ...
This eulogy for one of the worst of the US bishops makes no bones about the fact that Untener was as liberal as they come. They come right out and admit that he dissented on several hot button issues like ordination of women and artificial contraception. Naturally this earns him the highest honors in their eyes.

But what is really interesting is their admission that this information about Untener was on the table before he was appointed bishop of Saginaw. Loyal Catholic laypeople had filmed Untener presenting pornography to his seminarians. This information was sent to Rome. It was known before the appointment was made official.

Yet for some reason, Untener was appointed bishop anyway. Otherwise history would have lost that immortal line, "Hi, I'm Ken and I'm going to be your bishop."

At this time JPII has already been pope for 2 years. If he were a president he'd be halfway through his term. He finds out that someone scheduled to be appointed bishop, someone who is young enough to be bishop for more than 30 years, has been caught on tape promoting sexual promiscuity in his position as seminary rector. What does he do? He appoints him bishop anyway!! And Saginaw gets to suffer under Untener for the next 24 years (which could have been many more if he didn't have the decency to die young).

How can this be explained? Those who are quick to explain away the scandals, and to claim that the pope "didn't know," what do you say to this one? In this case he absolutely did know. And with all the scandals going on today, this represents the culmination -- a perverted seminary rector who teaches "promiscuity" to his seminarians becomes a bishop who is the best friend of every liberal feminist kook in the Church.

I'd be interested to see more background information from "The Wanderer" or similar sources regarding the video tape and the events of 1980 that led to his ordination.

2 posted on 04/10/2004 12:25:08 PM PDT by Maximilian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maximilian
I kept looking for the explicit reference to pornography, but didn't find it.

Perhaps you could point it out, unless, of course, you're making assumptions.

3 posted on 04/10/2004 12:37:26 PM PDT by sinkspur (Adopt a dog or a cat from an animal shelter! It will save one life, and may save two.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Maximilian
Bishops are chosen by bishops. To assume that the pope knew this man or know anything about him is like assuming that Bush knows an asst. secretary of Commerce.
4 posted on 04/10/2004 1:36:05 PM PDT by RobbyS (JMJ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Maximilian
The answer I usually get is that this is part of some top secret war. At times I am told they are put in place for some grand scheme. I never believe any of it.
5 posted on 04/10/2004 1:36:19 PM PDT by johnb2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
I kept looking for the explicit reference to pornography, but didn't find it.

Try this for more information on the sexually explicit material presented to the seminarians:

The Roots of the Scandal by Michael Rose

The use of sexually explicit textbooks that undermine teaching on sexual morality was part of a wider program of “sexual reassessment” or desensitization that seminarians were forced to undergo during their formation for the holy priesthood.

At the same time Father Kosnik was teaching seminarians at St. John’s in Michigan (attended by seminarians from all dioceses in that state), sexually explicit movies were shown to seminarians as a part of a morality course. Fathers Kenneth Untener and Robert Rose were seminary administrators at the time. (Father Untener was named Bishop of Saginaw in 1980 and Father Rose was named Bishop of Gaylord in 1981, and later Bishop of Grand Rapids.) Shortly after the Vatican announced that Untener was going to lead the Saginaw diocese, the Detroit Free Press and the National Catholic Register reported that he was summoned to Rome to explain his seminary program. With the help of Detroit’s Cardinal John Dearden, he apparently argued successfully in his own defense.

According to Detroit priest Father Eduard Perrone, the “porno flicks” were shown at the seminary as part of a class on morality. “They showed a man masturbating, a woman masturbating, couples copulating, homosexuals humping,” he recalled. The crudely produced films, he said, were supposedly put together by doctors who worked for clinical sex study institutes. “There were ladies in the class too,” he explained, “because at that time they were already teaching seminarians and laity together.”

Isn't it interesting how the 2 seminary directors showing gay porno to their seminarians are each made bishops within a couple years? It shows you what was the direct route to promotion. Can anyone say "Gay mafia"?

And if you think this wasn't part of a coordinated program and a homosexual promotion network, it turns out Untener wasn't the only one showing porno movies to his seminarians:

Archbishop Rembert Weakland of Milwaukee also routinely allowed seminary students to participate in a sexually explicit program entitled, “Sexual Attitude Reassessment,” so that seminarians could “rethink” their views on sexuality and conform with what the archbishop considered to be his more positive attitude. The program’s registration form promised to examine “how we were trained (or not trained) to hold restricting attitudes about our sexuality.” For at least ten years (1978-1988), Milwaukee seminarians and others attending these workshops at the archdiocesan center viewed a series of explicit movies. These showcased on the big screen male and female masturbation, heterosexual and homosexual intercourse, and variations of oral sex. The program drew protests for years, but it was not until 1988, when a local Christian television station exposed the program that the court of public opinion forced the archdiocese to shut it down.

6 posted on 04/10/2004 1:40:06 PM PDT by Maximilian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: johnb2004
The answer I usually get is that this is part of some top secret war. At times I am told they are put in place for some grand scheme. I never believe any of it.

There was a really great article posted here a week or two back about this topic, how conservative Catholics are always put off with the line, "We're working on a special present for you in the basement, but it will spoil the surprise if we let you know about it before Christmas." But then Christmas never comes for the loyal Catholics waiting for their present from the bishop.

7 posted on 04/10/2004 1:42:25 PM PDT by Maximilian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS
Bishops are chosen by bishops. To assume that the pope knew this man or know anything about him is like assuming that Bush knows an asst. secretary of Commerce.

This went right to the top. Only the pope ultimately makes the appointment. Cardinal Dearden of Detroit accompanied Untener to Rome to plead his case.

And actually, President Bush probably does know the names of most Asst. Secretaries of Commerce. And you can be sure that if one of them is named "Mohammed Atta" or if there is documented evidence that he is a member of the Communist Party, there is absolutely no doubt that Pres. Bush will personally intervene to get rid of his sorry ass and the sorry excuse who placed him in that position in the first place. If the Pope were doing his job, not only would he have refused to appoint Untener bishop of Saginaw, he would demanded Dearden's resignation as well.

8 posted on 04/10/2004 1:47:24 PM PDT by Maximilian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Maximilian
And I repeat, bishops apppoint bishops. You say he had a sponsor, and this would certainly override any protests from laymen. Say a prayer for both the Cardinal and the bishop. They need alll the help they can get.
9 posted on 04/10/2004 1:55:25 PM PDT by RobbyS (JMJ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Maximilian
I for one am glad he's gone. You're quite right, someone like this should never be made bishop. In these days when moral heresy is rampant, bishops must be willing to stand up for the Church's unchanging teachings on sexual morality.
10 posted on 04/10/2004 2:22:16 PM PDT by Unam Sanctam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Maximilian
WOW! There is no end to all this garbage.
11 posted on 04/10/2004 2:37:57 PM PDT by johnb2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Maximilian
Logic is us no use.
12 posted on 04/10/2004 2:39:00 PM PDT by johnb2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Maximilian
The thing is you may not question any of this. You are only allowed to pray. If you question it, then your fidelity will be questioned.
13 posted on 04/10/2004 2:40:38 PM PDT by johnb2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Canticle_of_Deborah; Desdemona; narses; sinkspur; Maximilian
But he acknowledged on one occasion that congregational participation had actually declined under the new norms.
14 posted on 04/10/2004 2:48:39 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maximilian
It was a terrible period but St. John's does not exist as a seminary anymore. About the time Untener was made a Bishop, actually a few years later, the Vatican sent its own representative around to check out the American Seminaries. I forget if this is in Micheal Rose's book, but it took a young priest and one of his freinds still in the seminary to expose what was STILL going on. They had the evidence translated into Polish and slipped under the Vatican rep's. door. He was staying at St. John's and for his visit many things had been "swept under the rug," so to speak. However it was just as bad if not worse than when Untener was there. The Vatican Rep. went to the Cardinal (by this time it was Szocka) and the bottom line was that the Seminary was moved to Sacred Heart in Detroit. The Cardinal of Detroit has more power over Sacred Heart and since the mid-80s Sacred Heart has gotten a lot better. The Philosophy dept. is very sound and Theology is on its way to being Conservative Catholic.

At the time it was closed most of the faculty of St. John's was brought to Sacred Heart,(tenure/law suits) but, as they have left or died their replacements have been, for the most part, very solid. Bishop Vigneron did a lot to bring Sacred Heart out of its bad reputation. Not soon enough for Micheal Rose's book unfortunately. I got a chance to speak briefly with Rose when he came to Detroit and he said he was encouraged by the good reports he had gotten concerning Sacred Heart Seminary.

Here in Detroit we pray that our Cardinal Maida will continue to support the current "track" Sacred Heart is on. Just a few more years and there will be a good number of very devout solid Catholic priests in this Diocese. Many of these young Sacred Heart seminarians are very good, they know their Catholic Faith and they know it is going to be a difficult task to re-Catechise this diocese. Please pray for them.

15 posted on 04/10/2004 2:59:52 PM PDT by Diva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Diva
Here in Detroit we pray that our Cardinal Maida will continue to support the current "track" Sacred Heart is on. Just a few more years and there will be a good number of very devout solid Catholic priests in this Diocese. Many of these young Sacred Heart seminarians are very good, they know their Catholic Faith and they know it is going to be a difficult task to re-Catechise this diocese.

This is really interesting. I was under the impression Maida was not one of the orthodox ones. It's a very good thing and sign, don't get me wrong. We saw the numbers in the seminary here rise under Rigali - and ours never really sank too badly. They took men who did not belong there (no longer), but the teaching was sound.

Untener I didn't know at all.
16 posted on 04/10/2004 3:04:41 PM PDT by Desdemona (Proverbs 18:2 A fool takes no pleasure in understanding, but only in expressing his opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Desdemona
Well, I never said Maida was Orthodox exactly. I think he is but he is surrounded by so many who are not that it would be hard to know just what he says as the "filters" are quite strong. I don't think Cardinal Maida likes to rock the boat but he can be supportive of those who want an orthodox parish or seminary. I'm sure he wants a good seminary but because of the political nature of this diocese and the powerful enfluence some of the clergy who raise lots of cash have, it can be difficult at times.
17 posted on 04/10/2004 3:20:55 PM PDT by Diva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Diva
because of the political nature of this diocese and the powerful enfluence some of the clergy who raise lots of cash have, it can be difficult at times.

I have this feeling when you get right down to it, all the cities are in this boat. That was one of the things I worried about when Burke came here. He's from a smaller place and hasn't had to deal with politics on the city scale. One can get past it, but it's not easy to do.
18 posted on 04/10/2004 3:28:30 PM PDT by Desdemona (Proverbs 18:2 A fool takes no pleasure in understanding, but only in expressing his opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Diva

Does the Detroit Archdiocese allow seminarians who gew up being parishoners of Assumption Grotto?
19 posted on 04/10/2004 3:33:10 PM PDT by RFT1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Maximilian
Maxililian, Thanks for that. It needs to be said and you said it very well.

Also, BIG BUMP for The Wanderer !

20 posted on 04/10/2004 4:05:55 PM PDT by cpforlife.org (The Missing Key of the Pro-Life Movement is at www.CpForLife.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson