Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vatican says Mass norms must be followed exactly to ensure reverence
Catholic News Service ^ | April 23, 2004 | Cindy Wooden

Posted on 04/23/2004 6:04:36 AM PDT by Desdemona

Vatican says Mass norms must be followed exactly to ensure reverence

By Cindy Wooden Catholic News Service

VATICAN CITY (CNS) -- The norms for celebrating Mass must be followed exactly to ensure reverence for the Eucharist and to preserve the unity of the Catholic Church, said a new Vatican document.

"In some places the perpetration of liturgical abuses has become almost habitual, a fact which obviously cannot be allowed and must cease," said the document, "Redemptoris Sacramentum" ("The Sacrament of Redemption"), written by the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Sacraments.

The instruction, approved by Pope John Paul II and released at an April 23 Vatican press conference, particularly cited as abuses the use of eucharistic prayers not approved by the church, changing approved prayer texts, and allowing lay people to carry out functions reserved to a priest or deacon.

The document said that while it was "laudable" to encourage boys and young men to be altar servers, girls and women can be altar servers if the local bishop permitted the practice.

Cardinal Francis Arinze, prefect of the congregation, told reporters, "No one should be surprised that over the course of time the holy church, our mother, has developed words, actions and, therefore, directives regarding this supreme act of worship.

"The eucharistic norms were elaborated to express and safeguard the eucharistic mystery and, even more, to demonstrate that it is the church which celebrates this august sacrifice and sacrament," he said.

Because the Mass and Eucharist are so important to the church, he said, practices that violate the church's norms cannot be taken lightly.

The norms reaffirm church teaching that a Catholic, in a situation of serious sin, must go to confession before approaching the Eucharist.

Cardinal Arinze refused to answer a direct question about whether Massachusetts Sen. John F. Kerry, the probable Democratic nominee for U.S. president and a supporter of legalized abortion, should be denied Communion unless he goes to confession and repents for his position.

"The norm of the church is clear," he said. "The church exists in the United States. There are bishops there, let them interpret it."

However, when asked more generally if a priest should refuse Communion to a politician who supports abortion, Cardinal Arinze said, "Yes."

"If the person should not receive Communion, then he should not be given it," the cardinal said.

Introducing the document, Archbishop Angelo Amato, secretary of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, which collaborated in writing the instruction, said that celebrating the Mass in an "arbitrary" manner not only "deforms the celebration, but provokes doctrinal insecurity, perplexity and scandal among the people of God."

The document highlighted violations of existing church norms, but did not set new rules.

It recognized as legitimate the various practices that local bishops have been authorized to permit, including Communion in the hand and the distribution of Communion under the species of bread and wine.

At the same time, it insisted that lay people delegated to assist with the distribution of Communion be referred to as "extraordinary ministers of holy Communion," rather than as eucharistic ministers to emphasize the fact that in the Catholic liturgy the priest is the minister of the Eucharist.

Extraordinary ministers are to assist only when the number of communicants would make it difficult for the priests present to distribute Communion to everyone.

If other priests are present at the Mass and able to help distribute Communion they must do so before extraordinary ministers are employed, it said.

The instruction explicitly bans the practice where priests, "although present at the celebration, abstain from distributing Communion and hand this function over to laypersons."

Any member of the church, it said, "has the right to lodge a complaint regarding a liturgical abuse to the diocesan bishop ... or to the Apostolic See."

The document said, however, that a complaint should be submitted first to the local bishop and that it should be done "in truth and charity."

Unlike an early draft of the document, which was leaked to the press last summer, the instruction did not ban liturgical dance; it did not mention dance at all.

The document said the Second Vatican Council fostered the participation of lay people in the Mass through "responses, psalmody, antiphons and canticles, as well as actions or movements and gestures, and called for sacred silence to be maintained at the proper times."

Following the council's direction, it said, in the choice of music, optional prayers, church decoration and the homily, "there is ample possibility for introducing into each celebration a certain variety."

But only approved Scripture readings are allowed, only a priest or deacon may give the homily and only approved eucharistic prayers can be recited -- and those only by priests.

Anyone at Mass who gives "free reign to his own inclinations, even if he is a priest, injures the substantial unity of the Roman rite, which ought to be vigorously preserved," said the instruction.

"The reprobated practice by which priests, deacons or the faithful here and there alter or vary at will the texts of the sacred liturgy that they are charged to pronounce must cease," it said.

The instruction emphasized that the Eucharist is the memorial of Christ's sacrifice and is not simply a "fraternal meal."

Standing, sitting and kneeling, singing, reciting prayers and praying in silence are all part of an active participation in the Mass, it said.

Reaffirming previous Vatican directives, the instruction said wheat is the only grain acceptable for making hosts and that honey or sugar are not to be added.

While priests who have been laicized may administer the sacrament of confession to someone in danger of death, they are not to celebrate Mass under any circumstances, nor should they serve publicly as lectors or altar servers "lest confusion arise among Christ's faithful."

According to the instruction, some very serious abuses arise from a misplaced desire to promote ecumenism; the document said Mass is not to be concelebrated with a non-Catholic minister.

"The Eucharist is the apex of a Catholic celebration," Cardinal Arinze said. Shared Communion is the goal of Christian unity, not a means to foster full unity in faith and doctrine.

"The Eucharist is not our possession to be given to our friends," he said, but rather it belongs to the church and is a sign of faith held in common.

- - -


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: catholiclist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-104 next last
Comment #21 Removed by Moderator

To: Desdemona
I'll have to look and see what it said about music.

Very little, other than using the adjective 'sacred'.

[57.] It is the right of the community of Christ’s faithful that especially in the Sunday celebration there should customarily be true and suitable sacred music, and that there should always be an altar, vestments and sacred linens that are dignified, proper, and clean, in accordance with the norms.

And no music during the Eucharistic Prayer.

22 posted on 04/23/2004 7:47:21 AM PDT by lrslattery (Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam - http://slatts.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: sartorius
I read a lot of this and honestly, it's still a little too subjective. I do think, though, that this is a not so subtle message to the bishops to clean up their acts when it comes to Mass.
23 posted on 04/23/2004 7:49:56 AM PDT by Desdemona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: sartorius
I read a lot of this and honestly, it's still a little too subjective. I do think, though, that this is a not so subtle message to the bishops to clean up their acts when it comes to Mass.
24 posted on 04/23/2004 7:50:08 AM PDT by Desdemona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

Comment #25 Removed by Moderator

To: lrslattery
And no music during the Eucharistic Prayer.

This is the one that confuses me. I've heard it chanted. Does this mean that the modern Mass settings that have undercurrent background noise is to be eliminated, or that the Eucharistic Prayer must be said.
26 posted on 04/23/2004 7:52:41 AM PDT by Desdemona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

Comment #27 Removed by Moderator

Comment #28 Removed by Moderator

To: sartorius
You get the idea that the next statement is going to have teeth. They've been getting increasingly stronger.
29 posted on 04/23/2004 8:02:18 AM PDT by Desdemona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Desdemona
No. There are some places where people play 'background' music during the Eucharistic Prayer. This was prohibited years ago, yet some still insist on doing it.
30 posted on 04/23/2004 8:08:02 AM PDT by lrslattery (Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam - http://slatts.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: All
I have read the document and the replies on this forum. I must say that as of today I no longer consider myself Catholic. Maybe I never was despite 16 years of Catholic education, being married in the church, having my children educated at Catholic schools and universities.

Christ said "Do this in remembrance of me." As far as I can tell he did not set down a hundred rules at the same time. I am out of here. Let the flames begin...
31 posted on 04/23/2004 8:13:01 AM PDT by Investment Biker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Desdemona
the instruction did not ban liturgical dance; it did not mention dance at all.

How Unfortunate!

32 posted on 04/23/2004 8:18:03 AM PDT by Fast Ed97
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Investment Biker
You are falling away over Mass norms? These are put in place for the good of the faith. This is the pinnacle of public prayer for us. What has been happening is that various bishops have been making a mockery of sanctity and this needs to stop. The fact that there aren't any teeth in this document is frustrating for everyone.

I will pray for your soul.
33 posted on 04/23/2004 8:18:19 AM PDT by Desdemona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Desdemona
I will pray for your soul.

I appreciate your thoughts. A very good friend of mine has a son that is studying to be a priest at Fransician University in Steubenville, Ohio ( a very conservative program). I have had the occasion to spent much time with this fine young man. Next time I see him and we are out together I will kid him and ask him if they brought back the selling of indulgences yet because I need some.

34 posted on 04/23/2004 8:35:05 AM PDT by Investment Biker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard
Bet you can't name more than three colleges which offer a legitimate course in Sacred Music.

There's Catholic U., (at least ONE prof is very solid), Westminster in N.j. (not really a college, but close..)

and where next?
35 posted on 04/23/2004 8:57:37 AM PDT by ninenot (Minister of Membership, TomasTorquemadaGentlemen'sClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard
Bet you can't name more than three colleges which offer a legitimate degree in Sacred Music in the USA.

There's Catholic U., (at least ONE prof is very solid).

and where next?
36 posted on 04/23/2004 8:58:30 AM PDT by ninenot (Minister of Membership, TomasTorquemadaGentlemen'sClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: lrslattery; Tadhg Séamus; Desdemona
Very little, other than using the adjective 'sacred'.

Makes me wonder whether this was an accident or not.

The term "sacred" music has a VERY specific meaning--and does NOT include hymns.

37 posted on 04/23/2004 9:01:03 AM PDT by ninenot (Minister of Membership, TomasTorquemadaGentlemen'sClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Desdemona
Historically, playing music during the Canon was strongly discouraged. Thus, when the choir used, e.g., Mozart's "Coronation Mass," the priest WAITED until the end of the Sanctus to begin the Canon, and WAITED until the end of the Benedictus to begin the prayers following the Elevation.

Musicians as a group tend to think that continuous music is a good thing, which demonstrates that they are a bit dotty.
38 posted on 04/23/2004 9:03:51 AM PDT by ninenot (Minister of Membership, TomasTorquemadaGentlemen'sClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: sartorius; ArrogantBustard; drstevej; BlackElk; CAtholic Family Association; GirlShortstop; ...
His Holiness will sincerely consider sending in a Papal Legate. The Wanderer has been pushing this idea for quite some time. This office, by the way, is the same as a "Papal Terminator Unit" and has been used in the past....

With battle-axes and firewood aplenty, the TTGC stands ready to assist, vigorously.

39 posted on 04/23/2004 9:06:05 AM PDT by ninenot (Minister of Membership, TomasTorquemadaGentlemen'sClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: ninenot
Beats me ...
40 posted on 04/23/2004 9:07:51 AM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-104 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson