Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: dsc; ninenot; ArrogantBustard; BlackElk; sandyeggo; american colleen; NYer; sartorius; All
Ping

Here are some some the specific abuses addressed. The tone is fairly strong. I guess it all depends on how much the laity holds the bishops' feet to the fire.
2 posted on 04/24/2004 7:35:01 AM PDT by Desdemona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Desdemona
It seemed to me that of the common abuses, the one they used the strongest language against was the practice of habitual use of lay extraordinary ministers of Holy Communion.

Oddly, that seems to have been omitted from this article.

3 posted on 04/24/2004 7:42:15 AM PDT by B Knotts (Just another medieval Catholic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Desdemona
" "The pouring of the blood of Christ after the consecration from one vessel to another is completely to be avoided, lest anything should happen that would be to the detriment of so great a mystery. Never to be used for containing the blood of the Lord are flagons, bowls or other vessels." This instruction prohibits the widespread U.S. practice of placing one or more pitchers of wine on the altar before the consecration when Communion is to be distributed under both kinds, and then pouring that wine into chalices before Communion. A related instruction says there is no problem with placing multiple chalices filled with wine on the altar before the consecration, but for the sake of "sign value" the main chalice should be larger than the others. "

NOTED
5 posted on 04/24/2004 7:49:29 AM PDT by StAthanasiustheGreat (Vocatus Atque Non Vocatus Deus Aderit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Desdemona
Several years ago my wife and I volunteered to clean the church after each service. I found bread crumbs everywhere. We decided to start going to another church in the area. I now attend a church that uses the host instead of a loaf of bread and it is distributed like they did before Vatican II.
7 posted on 04/24/2004 9:45:11 AM PDT by rudyrudy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Desdemona
I guess it all depends on how much the laity holds the bishops' feet to the fire.

AmBishops have asbestos feet.

40 posted on 04/25/2004 11:45:01 AM PDT by Catholicguy (MT1618 Church of Peter remains pure and spotless from all leading into error, or heretical fraud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Desdemona
I guess it all depends on how much the laity holds the bishops' feet to the fire.

AmBishops have asbestos feet.

41 posted on 04/25/2004 11:45:04 AM PDT by Catholicguy (MT1618 Church of Peter remains pure and spotless from all leading into error, or heretical fraud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson