Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: The_Reader_David
That still doesn't compute.

Surely, the original error of the previous Pope had to be ex-cathedra as well, right?

Or, do we sweep all errors of Popes into the non-ex-cathedra category? Isn't that too convenient?

If infallibility is limited only to ex-cathedra, then why all the furor over Vatican II? Oh, is it because, ex-cathedra, that Pope changed a lot of things, that had been ex-cathedra before him? And thus, any change corrected an error or introduced an error, and thus, even ex-cathedra, some pope somewhere erred?
7 posted on 04/30/2004 7:45:26 AM PDT by FactQuest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: FactQuest; The_Reader_David
If infallibility is limited only to ex-cathedra, then why all the furor over Vatican II? Oh, is it because, ex-cathedra, that Pope changed a lot of things, that had been ex-cathedra before him?

Vatican II didn't change any teachings of the Church.

27 posted on 04/30/2004 10:46:53 AM PDT by Hermann the Cherusker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson