Replies

gbcdoj is one of the n00bs that enjoys coming in here as of late to constantly stir the pot, bait and harass traditional Catholics and those who worship in Society chapels. The other is listed right after him.

Every single one of the articles they post are obsessively geared toward the trad/Rome flamewars that most around here have put aside as of late in the name of harmony.

Note how famliar they seem with this forum and posting here and how such doesn't coincide with their joined date.

They're deceptive trolls and/or re-treads banees and should be regarded as such. One even admitted to "sharing a desk at work" with banned poster Steven Hand after being put on the spot.

They think they're clever but they're not. If the mods can't or won't deal with them, let them be known for what they are.

hey, no need for ad hominem attacks.

I have no relation, at all, with "McClave". I have never met him, Stephen Hand, or any of the writers of the site "Traditional catholic reflections" nor corresponded with any of them in any way, except perhaps on this board. This is my only account I have ever had on this forum, and as for the supposed familiarity - this is accounted for by the fact that I registered on Jan 1 and posted first on March 14 - about the "separation of church and state" (supporting the position of Bl. Pius IX) and not about anything to do with the Society or any other traditionalist group.

Viva Christo Rey is not a SSPXer - he is a sedevacantist. At the very least a material schismatic according to the Society (cf. Sedevacantism), which believes that the Pope is actually a Pope and expelled the sedevacantist "Society of St. Pius V" members. Surely you have nothing against attempting to assist a schismatic out of his schism, or defending Blessed John XXIII from the totally unwarranted charge of contumacious heresy!

Listen AAA WORST, if we needed more poop from you, we'd squeeze your head. As it is, we're are happy to discuss theology with you, if you can stick to the issues and stop with the names, names, names. Stop the namby pamby... I thought screennames were supposed to take care of names? Leave yesterday where it is and stick to today. Someone once said your type never grew up emotionally (and thus all the "Gotcha! I"m tellin' Mummy!). I'm willing to believe it ain't so, but you'll have to act a little more mature, heh?

Now, hows' that for humor?

.....bait and harass traditional Catholics...

Huh? On the defense now?

I thought we were defending the Pope!

Is this an SSPX-Sede-Gruner-Feeneyite-Whatever private club?

Did we come in the wrong door?

I thought this was a "Religion" section? Show us (orthodox, Roman, Catholics) where we are allowed to post as Freepers and we'll stay there since you can't follow an argument without obsessively bringing up Steven Hand or whomever the heck freaks you out....

gbcdoj is one of the n00bs that enjoys coming in here as of late to constantly stir the pot, bait and harass traditional Catholics and those who worship in Society chapels.

I have not gotten that impression. I am impressed with the quality of the material that gbcdoj is posting. While I don't agree with him, it would be unfair to mis-characterize his participation. In contrast, the other person you mention has done little except throw around gratuitous insults. But while gbcdoj's position may be similar to that other person, his style is night and day. And "style" consists of things like courtesy and charity and knowledgeableness, which it makes it an important consideration.