Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Land of the Irish

Cardinal Stickler isn't "traditional"? The Eastern-rite bishops aren't "traditional"?

If the SSPX bishops were really traditional, they'd be in subjection to the Apostolic See. Try reading Lefebvre's 1990 letter to Bishop de Castro Meyer and compare it with Pius XII's "Ad Apostolorum Principis" - you'll see how "traditional" he was, directly contradicting the teaching of Pius XII on the election of bishops.


67 posted on 05/27/2004 8:37:54 PM PDT by gbcdoj (in mundo pressuram habetis, sed confidite, ego vici mundum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]


To: gbcdoj
Cardinal Stickler isn't "traditional"?

Cardinal Strickler is a good and holy man. I've met him in person. However he was not committing the "sin" of ordaining traditional priests as traditional bishops to preserve the Catholic Faith. Therefore, the modernists, including the Pope, leave him alone.

69 posted on 05/27/2004 8:52:08 PM PDT by Land of the Irish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

To: gbcdoj
If the SSPX bishops were really traditional, they'd be in subjection to the Apostolic See.

They are. They are in full subjection to the pre-conciliar Apostolic See, the Traditional, anti-Modernist Popes. They cannot obey two masters who contradict each other. Nobody who is honest can.

74 posted on 05/27/2004 9:31:14 PM PDT by Land of the Irish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson