Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Mershon
I was referring to subdeacons, not deacons. I think the order of deacon is tremendously important; I wouldn't be doing it otherwise.
27 posted on 07/21/2004 2:54:27 PM PDT by sinkspur (There's no problem on the inside of a kid that the outside of a dog can't cure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: sinkspur

I think the order of deacon is tremendously important.

I am glad to see you are a man of your convictions. I too have met some good ones and see some tremendous good they do in the Church--except that most of them still think they are laymen, based on my personal judgment.

Also, whatever did the pre-Vatican II Church do without permanent deacons?

Oops! I forgot. They actually had lots of priests back then--prior to the GREAT RENEWAL in the wake of that magnanimous council--the greatest of all time--mind you. They had priests back then... And lots of seminarians and boys discerning becoming vocations, and altar boys--lots of them.


28 posted on 07/21/2004 4:50:25 PM PDT by mershonathome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson