Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Capital Punishment: A Personal Statement (Chuck Colson)
Prison Fellowship ^ | Chuck Colson

Posted on 11/08/2004 12:51:19 PM PST by xzins

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last
To: connectthedots

Yes, in other cases they are 6 times more likely to get off death row, for example, constantly changing state laws.


41 posted on 11/11/2004 4:32:05 PM PST by Conservative Coulter Fan (BURN IN HELL, MICHAEL MOORE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: connectthedots

The point for me is a biblical point:

a. does the total bible, to include the NT, require the death penalty

b. does it all the death penalty

c. does it ban the death penalty.

Biblically, "b" is the answer. Therefore, you are able to hold your position and still be biblical. It would be wrong for you, however, to tell a death penalty advocate that they were biblically in error.

You could tell them that given current circumstances they aren't making the best choice.

I read recently that there are those who have been sent to death row who should have been sentenced to a lesser murder charge, and that that is the only way people conclude that we have placed convicts on death row in error.

No one disputes their being murderers.


42 posted on 11/11/2004 4:39:51 PM PST by xzins ((Now that the election's over; I need a new tagline...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: xzins

I would not tell someone who supports the death penalty that it was unBiblical. The problem isn't the Bible, it is all the corrupt prosecutors and judges who are willing to try and convict those whom they may actually believe may be innocent, even if they have to ignore the rule of law in doing so. to to many prosecutors, it is not about justice; it's about winning; and that is wrong.


43 posted on 11/11/2004 4:49:18 PM PST by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: connectthedots

Good.

You have your reasons. You have the experiences to have those kinds of reasons.

All I require is absolute certainty that the murderer is the one being executed. If that cannot be absolutely guaranteed, then I don't support the execution. When it can absolutely be guaranteed, then I have no problem with the execution.


44 posted on 11/11/2004 5:00:45 PM PST by xzins ((Now that the election's over; I need a new tagline...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: xzins

If there was substantial physical evidence combined with sufficient circumstantial evidence supported by physical evidence, I would not have a problem sentencing someone to death. If the only evidence was eyewitness accounts, I would not sentence anyone to death, and would be very suspicious about the absence of any physical evidence, especially if the witnesses did not personally know the accused.

A larger problem is with prosecutors threatening more serious criminal charges than warranted only to get a defendant to plead guilty to a lesser crime even if the evidence of the lesser crime is weak at best.


45 posted on 11/11/2004 5:09:40 PM PST by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson