*Really? The Popes I cited would have given their support to a schism, huh? You really don't seem to have the faintest clue as to what constitues Catholicism.
"The Popes I cited would have given their support to a schism, huh?"
1. No, they would have recognized it was impossible that Marcel Lefebvre was guilty of what JPII said he was. They could distinguish between protecting the traditional faith and rejecting the papacy. Neither you nor the people you emulate can do so.
2. There never was a schism. What you imagine was a schism was merely a fit of pique expressed by the Pontiff who could not stomach anyone standing up to his stupendous errors--not even when this was done simply to defend the Catholic faith from his destructive agenda.