Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Alex Murphy; kosta50; sionnsar; Agrarian; MarMema; monkfan; Tantumergo; Cronos; NYer; Vicomte13; ...
Thanks for the article, but lest there be any misunderstanding of the Orthodox Icon which is used here, readers should understand that what the author is talking about as a 14th century innovation from the Franciscans is NOT what the far older, Orthodox Icon is representing. The following is a standard Orthodox explanation of the theology taught by the Icon of the Birth of Christ.

"The icon of the Nativity expresses the presence of the Trinity in the economy of salvation (the unique light that is parted into three rays at the top of the icon) in particular the presence of the Holy Spirit. Second, the continuity of the Old and the New Testaments (the presence of the Isaiah who represents all the prophets of the Old). Third, the organic unity of Jesus redemptive acts: birth, death, descent into hell and resurrection. Fourth the messianic dignity of the Child (the presence of the ox, the ass and the shepherds because the Church teaches that ALL of creation was saved by Christ). Fifth, the perpetual virginity of the Theotokos (the three stars on her head and shoulders). Sixth, the cosmic dimension of the incarnation, so that from then onward, philosophers and scientists, learn from the Paraclete to sing their song of thanksgiving. The Nativity contains three important dogmatic facts: first, the descending movement of God; second the miracle of virginal maternity, the divine answer to the 'fiat' of the Virgin Mary; and third, the aim of divine philanthropy, namely the theosis of man."

For Orthodox Christianity, notwithstanding what may have happened in the West, the Feast of the Birth of Christ has no Santa Claus or commercial or touchy/feely meaning. It is profoundly intertwined with and expressive of the theosis of the entire creation.
2 posted on 12/14/2004 5:48:27 PM PST by Kolokotronis (Nuke the Cube!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Kolokotronis
For Orthodox Christianity, notwithstanding what may have happened in the West, the Feast of the Birth of Christ has no Santa Claus or commercial or touchy/feely meaning. It is profoundly intertwined with and expressive of the theosis of the entire creation.

Always appreciate my Orthodox brothers' perspective on things. Even though I am not Orthodox, your understanding of this coincides with mine. Regrettably, there are many Christians on FR who appear to insist that sort of thing must be observed alongside of the Incarnation...

3 posted on 12/14/2004 5:58:50 PM PST by Alex Murphy (Psalm 73)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Kolokotronis
There are a few other comments about the Orthodox icon and the theology that it represents that I think are worth mentioning.

The icon always has an ox and an ass, as Kolo mentions. These are not randomly chosen animals, but rather represent a direct reference to the words of Isaiah 1:3, where the Prophet writes -- "The ox knoweth his owner, and the ass his master's crib..."

Unlike Western artistic portrayals of the Nativity, traditional Orthodox iconography has the Virgin and Christ at the very center of the icon, whereas St. Joseph the Betrothed is off in the lower left hand corner of the icon. It is thereby made clear that he is not the father of the child. In addition, he looks troubled, and there is the figure of an old man standing in front of him, representing Satan, who tempted Joseph to doubt the words of the angel that had told him that the child was of God.

The characters at the lower right of the icon are usually of women midwives, who are washing Jesus, adding yet another layer of emphasis to the reality that Jesus was born physically -- and that his arrival on earth wasn't something merely mystical and symbolic.

There is usually a tree beneath Christ, which both signifies that He is the one prophesied to arise from the root of Jesse, and also is a prefiguring of the Cross.

The wise men, who arrived later, are off in the distance, while the simple shepherds, to whom the birth was first announced, are closer -- as well as being a reflection of the Gospel account, it also shows that the "common and simple folk" often have an easier and more direct route to being close to God than do the "wealthy and wise."

This is truly one of the richest icons in all of Orthodox iconography. And there is truly nothing sentimental about it...

The cosmic implications of the Nativity are also reflected in the hymnology of the Feast. The Troparion/Apolytikion of the Feast goes:

Thy Nativity, O Christ our God, hath shown to the world the light of wisdom. For by it, those who worshipped the stars were taught by a star to adore Thee, the Son of Righteousness, and to know Thee, the Orient from on high. O Lord, glory be to Thee."

The Kontakion of the Feast:

Today the Virgin gives birth to the Transcendent One, and the earth offers a cave to the Unapproachable One. Angels and shepherds glorify Him, and the magi journey with the star. For our sake, the pre-eternal God is born as a little Child."

The Exapostilarion sung at the Vigil:

From on high our Savior, the Dayspring of the East, hath visited us, and we who are in darkness and shadow have truly found Him: for the Lord hath been born of the Virgin."

And finally, a beautiful sticheron from the Praises of the Vigil:

Today Christ is born of the Virgin in Bethlehem. Today He who knows no beginning now begins to be, and the Word is made flesh. The powers of heaven greatly rejoice, and the earth with mankind makes glad. The Magi offer gifts, the shepherds proclaim the marvel, and we cry aloud without ceasing: Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace, good will among men.

Of course, all of it is even more beautiful when sung.

Wishing all a blessed preparation for the Nativity...

5 posted on 12/14/2004 6:36:31 PM PST by Agrarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Kolokotronis; Alex Murphy; sionnsar; Agrarian; MarMema; monkfan; Tantumergo; Cronos; NYer; ...
About customs...the "Christmas tree"

About the continuity of the Old and the New Testaments

Here Jesus directly invalidates the OT verses Exodus 21:24; Lev. 24:20; Deut. 19:21 and reinterprets them as something we should not follow:

Kolokotronis is absolutely on the mark when he says that Orthodox Christmas is not commercialized, always staying focused on Christ.

Thus, rather than wishing someone "Merry Christmas" we greet each other with "Christ is born!" and instead of "Marry Christmas to you too" we respond "Indeed, He is born!" This is not our personal holiday of merrymaking, but a celebration of the birth of our Saviour. It's not about us, Santa or sales.

Thus Christmas to the Orthodox has a different name and a different meaning: it is simply and always "The Birth of Christ."

Likewise, Orthodox Easter is not even called that, but "Resurrection." It is the central feast of the Church, eclipsing even His Birth. And, consistent with the focus on our Saviour, we do not wish each other "Happy Easter" (the word Easter is pagan), but rather exclaim "Christ is risen!" to which we reply "Indeed, He is risen!"

15 posted on 12/15/2004 12:35:16 AM PST by kosta50 (Eastern Orthodoxy is pure Christianity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Kolokotronis
For Orthodox Christianity, notwithstanding what may have happened in the West, the Feast of the Birth of Christ has no Santa Claus or commercial or touchy/feely meaning. It is profoundly intertwined with and expressive of the theosis of the entire creation.

And God in His wisdom has assisted in the preservation of that by keeping the calendars separate

Many blessings

26 posted on 12/16/2004 11:36:17 AM PST by RnMomof7 (because I'm good enough , and smart enough and darn it I deserve it ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson