I would normally be offended and not even respond to one
who calls another "deliberately deceptive", "ignorant",
"illiterate", and somewhere "prejudice" and "hate" are
included. But perhaps because I don't think you prefer such
ad hominem attacks to a rational argument and perhaps because I don't take you that seriously and am, in fact,
having some fun, I will just make a few observations. First, you are confusing "higher criticism" with textual
criticism. I would suggest you read the Nov. issue of
National Geographic for some understanding of what nearly
all scientists think about evolution. On the cover it
reads " WAS DARWIN RIGHT?" If you read the article you
will discover that the scientific community says "YES."
Please don't write the editors and say they are deceptive
liars, ignorant, illiterate, and full of hate and prejudice. You might unnecessarily insult the world's
foremost biologists, paleontologists, geneticists, and
anthropologists. Worse, if they're as good natured as I
am, they might embarrass you by asking for some facts.
If you'd like to learn more about biblical criticism (and
there are many types) I'd be glad to discuss it - and I'm
not being facetious, I mean it. All best,
Episcopalians have women ministers
If you'd like to learn more about biblical criticism (and there are many types) I'd be glad to discuss it - and I'm not being facetious, I mean it. All best,
In the infamous words of Gary Gilmore, let's do it!