Sorry, Reuben, but the Earth simply is a LOT older than 7,000 years. You can't read the bible that way. Seriously... just how do you suppose the space shuttle poked its way through the firmament (Gen. 1:7)?
And as for the fossil record: Yes, fossils can be deposited sometime in a layer or so above where they "should" be deposited. I presume you have already read and ignored how this can occur. But on the large scale, the fossil record is fantastically consistent. While you debate minutia whether a dinosaur is indigenous above or below the K-T boundary, ever seriously explain why vertebrates dont exist in pre-Cambrian rock? Why birds and mammals dont exist in pre-Devonian rock? Why human remains don't exist as in pre-Quarternary rock?
Evolution is called a theory, not a law, because by its nature it is impossible to recreate in a laboratory setting, not because there is any degree of uncertainty among scientists. Facets of micro-evolution have been elevated to law.
What science hasn't shown are the big points: How the chain of events was started in the first place, how the phenomenon of consciousness, how rationalism emerged, why it all took place. Until you deny God, the enormity and antiquity of the universe only serve to emphasize how treasured mankind is.
Newspapers' depiction of evolution is flat-out false. Their "life-in-a-bottle" are absurd. But they do not represent the truth of science. They are twisting science to achieve their nihilistic ends. BUt science has demonstrated beyond any doubt that the Earth is older than 7,000 years.
Heck, even just simply tracing our human family tree, we find that humanity is 1,000 generations removed from a common ancestor. (But yes, we do have a common grandmother only 1,000 generations ago.)
Yep, you said it, therefore it must be true. 'That's science for you! Just make the assertion and BAM it's true!
You can't read the bible that way.
And now a God hater that doesn't believe the Bible is going to lecture us all about Bible hermeneutics. But, wait! There is no explanation. Its Yet Another Fact By Fiat!
just how do you suppose the space shuttle poked its way through the firmament (Gen. 1:7)?
Now let's add to the good fun by an insult wrapped into a lie. (And a very poor understanding of a Scriptural passage.)
And as for the fossil record: Yes, fossils can be deposited sometime in a layer or so above where they "should" be deposited. I
And rebuttal? First it is required by all Evolutionists to change the statement because answering the real objection isn't possible. Clearly you have no intention of dealing with statement that marine fossils are found up on top of mountain ranges, rather you just say "above where they should be". This is the beauty of Evolution. It can be anything you want it to be since evolution is assumed a priori, so when fossils are found "above where they should be" you leave the safe confines of uniformitarianism and inject catastrophe or some massive geophysical anomaly in a feeble attempt to cover for it.
I presume you have already read and ignored how this can occur.
A patented Evolutionist debate tactic. Insult your opponent and hypocritically accuse them of doing what you routinely do.
But on the large scale, the fossil record is fantastically consistent.
Then make an easily demonstrable but huge lie. Clearly you have already read and ignored the thousands of statements made by evolutionary scientists who find fossils in layers where they shouldn't be. Those who haven't sold their souls to the evolutionists can see these things all the time.
While you debate minutia... <hypocritical minutia snipped>
Projection...
Evolution is called a theory, not a law, because by its nature it is impossible to recreate in a laboratory setting,
But if you were honest and used scientific terminology correctly, you wouldn't even call it theory because none of it is demonstrable in the laboratory, it is sheer speclation meriting, at best, the title "Hypothesis". But you and evolutionists aren't honest and won't use scientific terminology correctly because "it is the agenda, stupid". It has nothing to do with facts and truth, it has to do with jealously guarding evidence that would expose the lie.
What science hasn't shown are the big points:
Well, duh. I think that is usually my point. Science hasn't shown anything that would be mandatory prerequisite for accepting any part of evolution (like any example of macro-evolution). Even that crap about an earth that is billions of years old is made-up and unprovable. In the past century alone, evolutionists have changed the age of the earth by billions of years. When you have error best expressed in terms of orders of magnitude, it seems to me that something is heavily fictionalized. But to the pseudo-scientific evolutionist, it is just a matter of keeping the faith alive.
Until you deny God, the enormity and antiquity of the universe only serve to emphasize how treasured mankind is.
Blasphemer. I think I have had enough with your outrageous lies and insults. Evolution clearly teaches Goo to You Via The Zoo. The results of evolutionary thinking have given us abortion, eugenics, euthenasia, suicide, racism, genocide, and man depreciating ideologies like communism that places the role of the State far and above the individual. Your delusional statements don't have any correlation with the facts. In fact evolution is the most dehumanizing and the most condemning philosophy ever put forth - how dare you lie and blaspheme by saying otherwise.
A class troll if I ever saw one.