This is true for witnesses. Witness attitude toward the accused can affect wintness memory and even cause false memory recollection.
But, I am not a witness. I believe that you have overlooked this detail.
We are talking about written documents in Government possession.
Regardless what I or you think about the document, we can not change it. We can only choose to speak about it or to remain silent.
Why there is so much of blunt logical fallacy whenever there is serious discusion about Vatican's role in WWII and post WWII events?
Your arguments are only as valuable as your credibility. Merely linking to documents is not pursuasive. Neither are your 'explanations' of what you believe those documents prove.
The link is merely a search result for 10 documents in which Pavelic's name appears. You haven't produced any actual documents or internet postings of same. I guess you're claiming that if we went to the archives and took a look at that raw dossier, we'd find something incriminating the Vatican? If so, what?
At this point, YOU are the only witness around, and YOUR feelings are clearly conspiracy-oriented and anti-Catholic. Your motivation would impeach your statements in court, and that is a far more stringent test than we are required to apply in conversation.
As somebody said up the thread, this level of paranoia about the Vatican isn't healthy.