Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Canticle_of_Deborah

Elaborate, perhaps? The writings and the life of the Servant of God are critically examined, as are the the miracles attributed to his intercession.


67 posted on 01/30/2005 8:37:38 PM PST by gbcdoj ("The Pope orders, the cardinals do not obey, and the people do as they please" - Benedict XIV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]


To: gbcdoj

The old Promotor Fidei (devil's advocate) was solely responsible for arguing against the canonization of the proposed. It was his job to call witnesses from among the faithful and gather evidence of negative sanctity to ensure a thorough investigation. That position has been eliminated.

The Postulator who is appointed by the petitioner, normally presents the case only for the cause. Under the new law, he is responsible for arguing both for and against the cause. Now if you want to get someone canonized, are you going to present evidence to the contrary?

Opus Dei was therefore able to control the process and prevent those opposed to Escriva from testifying against him.

There is a Promotor of Justice who provides canonical counsel but his position is not that of the former devil's advocate. He is not required to gather evidence or call witnesses. His presence isn't even required.


68 posted on 01/30/2005 8:59:41 PM PST by Canticle_of_Deborah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson