Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: ultima ratio
But Ratzinger's own secretary, in the phony letter drawn up for Lefebvre to sign, repeated the word "suggestion"--which was the final straw for the Archbishop.

This letter was given to Msgr. Lefebvre to send in response to the Pope's letter:

Lastly, I wish to express my gratitude for the intention that you manifested to take into account the particular situation of the Society, proposing to nominate a bishop chosen from its members, and especially in charge of providing for its special needs. Of course, I leave to Your Holiness the decision concerning the person to be chosen and the opportune moment. May I just express the wish that this be in the not too distant future?

Of the letter you refer, Msgr. Lefebvre says:

Indeed, in that letter - I do not have it here - which he brought me from the Holy Father, there is an astonishing sentence. It goes, "It is possible that we consider one day granting you a consecration," as if it was something very vague, a mere possibility, an eventuality. I cannot accept that.

It would seem that he misremembered, as the response prepared for him does not fit with this "possibility".

57 posted on 03/06/2005 7:20:04 PM PST by gbcdoj ("That renowned simplicity of blind obedience" - St. Ignatius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: gbcdoj

"Of course, I leave to Your Holiness the decision, etc."

Sounds like a suggestion to me. Shows where some of Ratzinger's people were coming from. The letter was outrageous and demeaning.


59 posted on 03/06/2005 7:23:47 PM PST by ultima ratio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson