Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Kolokotronis
This is the proof of the authenticity of my love for Christ. If I am united with Christ, I am together with my neighbour, and this unity is not limited to the moment of communion, but only begins here. It becomes life, becomes flesh and blood, in the everyday experience of sharing life with my neighbour. Thus, the individual realities of my communicating and being part of the life of the Church are inseparably linked to one another.

The premise he's getting to here was true even before the New Covenant, wasn't it? The injunction to love one's neighbor as oneself predates Christ. Or is that not relevant?

I think he's saying that one can do that supremely through the Eucharist and it's binding power, but he uses the word authenticity here, which makes me nervous. The Holy Father used it too, made me nervous then too, because the Eucharist assists the person in his striving for Theosis, and It does so on a very individual, "I knew you when you were in the womb", "every one of the hairs on your head is numbered" basis.

When one uses the word authenticity in relation to proper disposition of reception of the Eucharist, it seems an extreme presumption to me, that differs immeasureably from the Spriritual advising of a Child of God to refrain from reception of the Holy Eucharist while in a state of grave sin.

My ultimate journey to Our Lord will provide the Communion he speaks of, but we are all in need of individual sculpting based on our weaknesses and strengths.

Maybe I just don't fully understand what he's getting at, but if I do, I don't think I see things as he does.

He may make a good Pope, I don't know that much about him, so I can't say for sure.

38 posted on 04/17/2005 12:39:11 PM PDT by AlbionGirl ("I know my Sheep, and my Sheep Know Me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: AlbionGirl
When one uses the word authenticity in relation to proper disposition of reception of the Eucharist, it seems an extreme presumption to me,

* I think Card. Ratzinger is speaking about what must follow Eucharist. Try re-reading what you highlighted.

40 posted on 04/17/2005 12:54:44 PM PDT by bornacatholic (Please, God. A Pope who will wake-up the West to Islam's war against us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: AlbionGirl; Agrarian

"The premise he's getting to here was true even before the New Covenant, wasn't it? The injunction to love one's neighbor as oneself predates Christ. Or is that not relevant?"

Relevant to me in this sense, this comment as well as more in the linked piece again seems to me to evince a sort of worldliness, or perhaps better said, a focus on the cares and tribulations of the world in a universal sense. I am not saying that we shouldn't be concerned for our brother's welfare, but I get the feeling what the Cardinal is talking about is a material sort of welfare, that that is the paramount concern rather than his spiritual welfare and in strengthening each other to keep our eyes focused on the mark, which is God. Of course, we all fail at that everyday, but keeping our eye on the mark has to be our primary goal.


48 posted on 04/17/2005 3:34:21 PM PDT by Kolokotronis ("Set a guard over my mouth, O Lord; keep watch over the door of my lips!" (Psalm 141:3))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson