So you equate a temporary, time restricted "vacancy" due to the death of the pope with the so-called "decades" of "anti-popes" that you and your ilk attribute to the Church?
You can't see the difference in implication?
When have I ever mentioned "decades" of "antipopes"?
No he is speaking of your comment:
"If the seat of Rome is "vacant" or in need of "reproval", then the gates of hell have prevailed"
In which you stated as much, perhaps you didn't mean what you said. And what exactly do you mean by "your ilk"?