While there is little difference among circumcised and uncircumcised men in reports of satisfaction with intercourse, women have a much higher rate of satisfaction when they have sex with circumcised men-- much like the guy who showers vs. the one who smells like a goat.
Circumcision is a whole lot less painful when done in infancy . . . and it puts the boy on track for giving his future wife the best sex she can get because circumcised men maintain better erections, longer erections and better and longer contact between the most sensitive part of the penis and the most sensitive part of his partner's vagina. As an added bonus, semen discarges are both fuller (quantity) and more complete (quality) much like a garden hose which is straight versus one which is kinked.
Circumcision is like the difference between fully naked, full contact sexual intercourse with the woman you love and a cheap poke inside the panties with a condom on and your testicles caught in your briefs. Forgive the graphic nature, but a sliding and sometimes uncooperative foreskin denies you both the full pleasure of fully nude, full contact sex-- breasts against breast, penis sliding back and forth freely inside your partner's vagina, testicles in contact with the outer lips of the female sexual orifice, hands against inner thighs, lips and tongues in full contact. Some of these contact points are, of course, possible with an intact foreskin, but all are not.
Is riding in a convertable with the roof down more sexy than riding in a boxy sedan with a leaky roof? Both will get you there, but only one does it in style.
Why do you think those who practice circumcision generally more fecund than those who do not?
Where's the evidence to back up all those claims?
Orthodox Jewish women have a much lower rate of cervix cancer than those married to uncircumcised men.
Orthodox Jewish women ware married to men who are generally faithful. The major factor in cervical cancer is the presence of other venereal diseases, such as herpes.
Cervical cancer rates in non-circumcising nations like Sweden and Norway are far lower than the rate in the US.
While there is little difference among circumcised and uncircumcised men in reports of satisfaction with intercourse
Citation?
women have a much higher rate of satisfaction when they have sex with circumcised men
Citation?
Some of the most dissatisfied women in the world are here in the circumcised US. You certainly don't here about French, Germans, Italians, and Chinese women bitching about their husbands being unable to have intercourse in a way that gives them pleasure.
Circumcision is a whole lot less painful when done in infancy
BS. Anytime a knife cuts off part of your penis, it is incredibly painful. Infants have to be physically restrained in order to allow circumcision to take place.
because circumcised men maintain better erections, longer erections and better and longer contact between the most sensitive part of the penis and the most sensitive part of his partner's vagina
Actually, many circumcised men are premature ejaculators. Surveys show circumcised men generally cannot last as long as uncircumcised, by a factor of about 33%.
Why do you think those who practice circumcision generally more fecund than those who do not?
Who would these fecund people be? Chinese? Indians? Russians? Germans? 80% of the world is uncircumcised.
I dare say you are totally unqualified to speak on uncircumcised sex since you have obviously never experienced it. Find a woman who has had both, ask her, then get back to us.
I wish I could reduce the text to business card size. LOL