His statement was, "Nothing in the New Testament is said about a return to the land or a rebuilding of the temple." That is true statement. With that you cannot disagree.
While Jesus and the apostles spoke about the destruction of the temple and the conquest of the land, they made no mention of any physical restoration. They didn't quote any of the OT prophecies so popular with dispensationalists as proving that the temple would be rebuilt, etc. The reason for this is obvious. Jesus is the true Israel, and His body, the church, is the true temple. They understood the true meaning of the OT prophecies as pointing to Jesus' finished work on behalf of His people (Luke 24:27).
Aniti-semetic/supercessionist drivel. Even when Jesus' disciples asked in the first chapter of Acts "will you at this time restore the Kingdom"....Jesus responded by tell them its not for them to know the "times", he didn't explain they weren't true "Israel" anymore. (not that I accept NT writings as inspired)