Posted on 09/23/2005 2:40:55 PM PDT by NYer
OK. I think I'm beginning to understand your point. I read the article by Cardinal Pell. A very good speech/article I might add.
I think you're misunderstanding my point of view. I don't question the church on matters of dogma. Nor do I think I have any significant disagreements on matters of dogma with those who would identify themselves as devout. There's one menu in that regard and I'm happy to accept it. I don't buy into the relativist line, and I do see your point with regard to the dangers of pigeonholing individuals into groups such as trad, non-trad, semi-trad, ad nauseum.
That said, embracing the church fully on matters of dogma does not mean that I accept that there is only one "proper" celebration of liturgy within the universal Catholic church and only one "correct" set of traditions. You'd note that if I were to accept those as premises, it would mean that either my eastern Catholic church or the western church were wrong with regards to liturgy and tradition. I don't buy into that line of reasoning.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.