Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Creationism, Intelligent Design, and Evolution
Stingray blog ^ | 09/26/2005 | Michael McCullough

Posted on 09/26/2005 12:03:20 PM PDT by DallasMike

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last
Stingray: Conservative blog

 Texas Clearinghouse for Katrina Aid

1 posted on 09/26/2005 12:03:27 PM PDT by DallasMike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DallasMike

The only thing I could possibly say to either group, would be 'prove it'


2 posted on 09/26/2005 12:08:37 PM PDT by stuartcr (Everything happens as God wants it to.....otherwise, things would be different.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DaveLoneRanger
Would you do me a favor and ping the Creationist list. I know that you and disagree on some points, but we both agree that Jesus Christ is the creator and ruler of the universe and I would argue that this is the important thing.

You're welcome to shoot me down or enlist others to shoot me down -- I'm not infallible and, if perceive that I'm wrong, I will gladly change my beliefs.

3 posted on 09/26/2005 12:14:24 PM PDT by DallasMike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Ghost of FReepers Past; ohioWfan; Tribune7; Tolkien; GrandEagle; Right in Wisconsin; Dataman; ..
Are Young-Earth-Creationists fighting the wrong battle? I think so. The whole creation saga takes up about 2 pages in my 800-page Bible. It's more concerned with "who" rather than "how" or "when." If the "when" of creation were really such an important topic, then God would have devoted more time to it in his revelation to the prophets. God appears to be much more concerned with the present and with our eternal than in the past.


Revelation 4:11Intelligent Design
See my profile for info

4 posted on 09/26/2005 12:26:33 PM PDT by wallcrawlr (http://www.bionicear.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasMike
Forget the debate about the age of the earth because that's just getting in the way. Let's put things in perspective and stick to the important topic of how Jesus can change people's lives when they accept him as Lord and Saviour. People need to personally know Jesus, not listen to debates on how old the earth is.

Genesis being the foundation for the entire Bible, with Jesus acknowledging His part in creation, discrediting the Biblical account of creation means that God/Jesus are liars, that God is not a supernatural being, and that God doesn't know the meaning of the phrase 'evening and morning', and 'it was good'. Adam was created an adult, just as the universe was created 'with age'.

Those that prefer to believe that their existence is due to some chance is welcome to continue to do so, but I believe that God created us for a reason.

5 posted on 09/26/2005 12:38:08 PM PDT by 4CJ (Tu ne cede malis!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wallcrawlr

Interesting article. Thanks for the ping.


6 posted on 09/26/2005 12:40:02 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wallcrawlr
Thanks for the ping. Please feel free to visit my main blogsite, Stingray, if this column touched you in any way.

Stingray: Conservative blog

 Texas Clearinghouse for Katrina Aid

7 posted on 09/26/2005 12:41:56 PM PDT by DallasMike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DallasMike
Out of all the potential stories about Christians out there -- murderous persecutions in China, enslavement of Christians in Africa, the role of Christians in the Katrina cleanup -- the Washington Post chose to write this one.

Hmmm...is it not true that the creationists are opening up another Flintstones museum?

The article is in the "Nation" section of the Post, anyway, so of course there won't be any stories from foreign countries.

8 posted on 09/26/2005 1:18:01 PM PDT by JasonSC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 4CJ; DallasMike

Agreed, creation isn't just in the first few pages, it's all over the Word.

I think the problem is simply the fact that we don't fully understand the dimension we call time. We see through a glass darkly in many ways.


9 posted on 09/26/2005 1:47:00 PM PDT by agrace (Where were you when I founded the earth? Tell me if you know so much. Job 38:4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DallasMike
Gerald L Schroeder, The Science Of God
10 posted on 09/26/2005 1:51:09 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasMike

This doesn't have one thing to do with Intelligent Design.


11 posted on 09/26/2005 2:27:14 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasMike

Good article .... Thanks D Mike.


12 posted on 09/26/2005 6:01:15 PM PDT by GregoTX (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onedoug
Gerald L Schroeder, The Science Of God

Bump

b'shem Y'shua

13 posted on 09/26/2005 6:54:20 PM PDT by Uri’el-2012 (Y'shua <==> YHvH is my Salvation (Psalm 118-14))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DallasMike
I will stick to your biblical reasons:

1. "very old" is subjective, you see what you "want" to see. 1000 years is very old. heck 100 years can be ancient history...I mean 9/11 seems to be ancient history.
2.YOM, is not a biblical reason. Yom can mean something like "Days of yore" but it can also mean "1 day" so in context with numbers (first,second, third) and coupled with "mornings" and "evenings" would biblically suggest just that a Day..(it actually has very similar usage to Day of English)

the Dawn of a new Day
vs.
the Dawn of the first Day.

3. read all of that section of 2 peter, it upholds noahs flood as global, it says scoffers won't believe the world was judged with water. it says they won't believe in the "second coming", that "a day is a thousand years" is in direct reference to the Lords patience..that the second coming not delayed, because the lord is slow, but because of his patience. it has nothing to do with words moses wrote a few thousand years earlier that through example God set the stage for a six days of work 1 day or rest...how many days in a week are there anyway?

you still have the problem of death before sin...what did Jesus die for...sin...why was the world created with sin in it??? it wasn't, Adam introduced sin...was Adam real?

could a "very good" world have the stench of rotting corpses, cancer and dismemberment of man and animals in it?

this argument will not provide Salvation, but it may be tough to TRUST in the Word that speaks of a literal resurrection, if it also speaks of Adam and Eve, death entering, vegetarianism, a flood that kills all land animals not on an ark. Which are not to be taken literal?
14 posted on 09/26/2005 7:02:58 PM PDT by flevit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasMike

YEC INTREP


15 posted on 09/26/2005 7:30:27 PM PDT by LiteKeeper (The radical secularization of America is happening)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: flevit
I will stick to your biblical reasons:

I would also like to see you -- or one of the other detractors -- address the scientific reasons. God created the universe. Why did he create it with the appearance of great age if it is less than 10,000 years old. That's not just a science issue but a spiritual issue as well.

YOM, is not a biblical reason. Yom can mean something like "Days of yore" but it can also mean "1 day" so in context with numbers (first,second, third) and coupled with "mornings" and "evenings" would biblically suggest just that a Day..(it actually has very similar usage to Day of English)

You admit that yom can mean something like "days of yore." Isaiah 30:8 says, "Now go, write it before them in a table, and note it in a book, that it may be for the time (yom) to come for ever and ever." This is just one example of the many times that yom is use to mean an indefinite period of time -- in this case, eternity. 

The word yom has multiple meanings. Use the meaning of the word that most fits with what God has shown us from his creation, It's much easier than trying to force creation to fit to a single narrow meaning of a word.

Adam introduced sin...was Adam real?

Yes, Adam and Eve were real persons.

you still have the problem of death before sin

I believe that the physical death of plants and animals existed in the world before Adam and Eve. Lions and tigers were designed to be carnivorous. Bats were designed to catch and eat flying insects. Some bacteria eat other bacteria. The Venus fly trap and the pitcher plant are examples of plants that eat insects. And why would snakes be designed with fangs and poison if it were not to be used against other animals?

Why was there the physical death of plants and animals before Adam and Eve? I don't know. One thing to note is that "the LORD God planted a garden eastward in Eden; and there he put the man whom he had formed. the LORD God planted a garden eastward in Eden; and there he put the man whom he had formed." (Genesis 2:7). God expelled Adam and Eve from the garden after the fall -- to me, that says that the Garden of Eden was a special place on the earth unlike any other place. Some have theorized that Adam and Eve were created to redeem creation from the ravages of Satan. I don't know, but it's possible.

 

 Stingray: Conservative blog

 Texas Clearinghouse for Katrina Aid

17 posted on 09/26/2005 8:24:30 PM PDT by DallasMike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: DaveLoneRanger
Very little time tonight
I understand -- time is a big problem for me, too. Thanks for the nice note.

18 posted on 09/26/2005 8:27:37 PM PDT by DallasMike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: DallasMike
appearance of great age: would be a tradition/interpretation of man. something that man teaches. (oh but there is also the whole God will use what is foolishness in the world to humble the wise)

yes Yom, just like "Day" in english can either a literal day or a non literal time period. it is discerned by the context of the writing.
why wouldn't you use the biblical writers to help figure out the intent and context of Genesis? would God deceive all the biblical writers?
(whether it disagrees with "science" is a separate question)

IE..find the writers that refer/quote back to Genesis 1-12 and see if they took at as Plainly written...if you do you will find even Jesus and NT writers, quotes it as plain TRUTH, not only that but a foundation for his purpose and an example by which the Jews set up their work week.
19 posted on 09/27/2005 3:31:04 AM PDT by flevit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: DallasMike
"Why did he create it with the appearance of great age if it is less than 10,000 years old."

How come God can create Adam with the appearance of age (he wasn't created a baby), but somehow it is trickery or deceit on His part to create the universe with age?

JM
20 posted on 09/27/2005 5:11:24 AM PDT by JohnnyM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson