Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: HarleyD; P-Marlowe; xzins; Corin Stormhands; blue-duncan; Frumanchu; topcat54
He who would understand the prophets had better begin with Paul's Epistle to the Galatians . . .

The author gets it all wrong in the first sentence. He who would understand Sha'ul's epistles had better begin by understanding the Tanakh and the Gospel, since his letters assume a basic familiarity with the Scriptures he was commenting on.

35 posted on 09/30/2005 12:15:33 PM PDT by Buggman (L'chaim b'Yeshua HaMashiach!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Buggman; P-Marlowe; xzins; Corin Stormhands; blue-duncan; Frumanchu; topcat54
”The author gets it all wrong in the first sentence.”

Well here is the first sentence broke out:

What do you disagree with? I would hope that you would concur with #1. That leaves #2. If you disagree with “is the fulfillment of all prophecy” then you must also believe that it is not the last phase of “God’s redemptive work”. Is this correct?

41 posted on 09/30/2005 12:34:34 PM PDT by HarleyD ("...and as many as had been appointed to eternal life believed." Acts 13:48)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson