The quotes from the Mishna show no such thing no matter what mss. is being quoted and thus the above is reading more into it and the Scriptures referenced then is there.
In saying: “We have multiple mentionings of young women in liturgical roles, both from the scripture and from written tradition”... there is nothing that suggests temple virgins.
“liturgical roles”? What exactly are you talking about and does how that translate into “temple virgins”?
What you are left with is apocryphal writings and Marshall's assertions, if that. If that's sufficient for you, well and good for you. But please don't tell me that women serving outside the tabernacle equals temple virgins, it's like asking me to not see what I see or read.
You are denying the evidence in front of you. I don’t know beyond what I have shown but what I showed points to an institution best described as “temple virgins”: unmarried women assisting priests or making liturgical objects, separated from larger society. There are three canonical references and multiple references from the Jewish tradition that together point to their existence.