This wasn't "faked evidence", since it wasn't used for or presented *as* evidence. It was just a demonstration of how the different moths have different visibility on sooty surfaces.
And when the fraud is exposed it is only natural to select for criticism those who uncovered the fraud.
It wasn't "fraud". Did you not understand the articles in the links, or did you not even bother to read them?
"Dear viewe, we glued these damn moths to the trees to prove a point about naturally occuring events" as a caption to these photos would deprive mean Creationists of their ammunition.