[LiteKeeper]

Ross has been so thoroughly refuted, at great length, that is amazing that articles like this continue to appear.

Please read this article as well as some of the others linked here starting about half-way down the page.

[truthfinder9]

Actually, only the isolated young-earth groups think Ross has been "thoroughly refuted." They also act like Ross is the only old-earth creationist, problem is that there are quite a few out there, in fact a long list of respected scholars, theologians, etc. Ken Ham & Co don't want you to know how small the YEC world is becoming. There's their amazing honesty again.

Introduction to the Creation-Date Debate
http://www.geocities.com/darrickdean/cr3.html

Is There Really Scientific Evidence for a Young Earth?
http://www.gps.caltech.edu/~tisco/yeclaimsbeta.html

Biblical Creation
http://www.evidence.info/apologetics/creation.html

A Matter of Days: Resolving a Creation Controversy
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1576833755/

[truthfinder9]

The second link should be:

Is There Really Scientific Evidence for a Young Earth?
http://www.lpl.arizona.edu/~matthewt/yeclaimsbeta.html