I can understand your sentiment about not wanting to have innocent blood on your hands, with respect to certain questionable bishops.
Just want to say that I had been engaged in pretty intense discussions about one Bishop Hubbard in the past couple of years here.
If nothing else, just consider the fact that even Hubbard himself never denied the that he had brought in an overwhelmingly large number of known homo seminarians and priests into the diocese during his tenure.
Care to take a stab at this "innocent move" within the context of current scandals?
I know nothing about the Hubbard case, so I can't comment other than to say that I don't believe homosexual men belong in the priesthood. There's that pesky 'near occasion of sin' difficulty that is bound to surface.