To: Claud
Sorry...I attributed it to you. :) No insult taken here. Though "Mike the Geek" (he's a FReeper too) might. *\;-)
And you're 100% right about the old Latin liturgy. I attend it every week when I can, and its beauty and power is undeniable.
Some day I shall have to arrange to attend/observe, though my one year of Latin is almost completely faded. The goodwife knows it though (Latin is among her dozen-odd languages).
11 posted on
02/15/2006 5:29:09 PM PST by
sionnsar
(†trad-anglican.faithweb.com† | Libs: Celebrate MY diversity! | Iran Azadi 2006 | Is it March yet?)
To: sionnsar
"There are many reasons to hold on to liturgical English. One is the fact that only with thee/thou and ye/you are the differences between 2nd person plural/singular and subjective/objective"
I take no offense at the attribution to sionnsar :-) With all due respect to liturgical English, however, as a Texan I must take exception to your above statement. The second person singular/plural is readily differentiated by the use of you/yall or your/yall's. I'm not at all sure how that would work in the liturgy, but I've heard it in plenty of sermons over the years!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson