Replies

If there is an unseen energy force that can recharge the magnetic field then it must also recharge the radio active elements also. The magnetic field is part of our Eco system, it effects everything. For you to say that rocks are not effected by the magnetic field is very presumptive of you are you a scientist? Where are your papers on the subject? Man does not know enough in the last one hundred years of study on the magnetic field and radio active decay to make such a bold statement.

We live in a closed system. There are no outside energy sources adding energy to the earth or the sun or any of the planets. Everything is dying and decaying. It is not getting better as evolutionist would make you to believe. The Second Law of Thermodynamics is in place and nothing is going to change it.

I read books on the subjects more than the Internet.

You assume that when these rocks were formed that they were perfect in their composition and that there was not any daughter elements in their formation.

The magnetic reversals are recorded not strength.

You must not read much about the dating methods and how if the date does not fit the expected outcome they assume the rock was corrupted by leaching.
If leaching can corrupt the date of rocks that they want to be a certain age then how can you say that leaching did not corrupt the outcome of the date on the rocks that met their criteria.

They also have dated rocks at the Grand Canyon that have different ages that what they should be. There are lave flows at the rim that are known to be young that Indians have tales about the flow, yet mysteriously they date older than what they should.

How in the world can anyone even claim that the moon has not had a magnetic field is beyond me. Were you there to measure this phenomena. History is made upon interpretation of visible evidence, that does not mean the interpretation is correct.

I do not discount any form of science, I just understand that if it does not fit with scripture it is not interpreted correctly. All areas of science have two or more interpretations and one of everyone of those is backed by scripture the others are incorrect.

The dating system fits nicely because those who do not wish to follow the word of God need an old earth interpretation to discount the Bible.

"I just understand that if it does not fit with scripture it is not interpreted correctly."

I think this quote says it all! What is the point of answering someone's questions about the facts of science when they will deliberately ignore or twist anything that contradicts something that they believe is absolute and infallible? You are basically admitting to willful ignorance... not the type of person who is going to come around no matter how many of his bogus criticisms are answered.