Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Did Pope Perform Miracle After His Death?
washingtonpost.com ^ | NICOLE WINFIELD

Posted on 03/14/2006 12:47:42 PM PST by tbird5

OME -- The sudden recovery of a young French nun suffering from Parkinson's disease is at the heart of the sainthood case for Pope John Paul II, the Polish priest who heads the inquiry said Monday.

The Vatican needs to confirm a miracle after John Paul's death for the pontiff to be beatified, the first step toward his possible canonization.

Monsignor Slawomir Oder told The Associated Press in an interview that an official inquiry into the nun's inexplicable recovery was beginning this week.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: catholic; catholicforum; idiotposters; johnpaulii; korankisser; miracle; notnews; takeittoreligion; wrongforum
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 201-214 next last
To: The Lumster
So, asking any dead person to pray for you is idolatry according to scripture

That's my point. Their souls are not "dead," they are alive in Christ, no?

Luke 23:43 "Amen I say to thee, this day thou shalt be with me in paradise."

101 posted on 03/14/2006 1:57:56 PM PST by kstewskis (don't get me started...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: The Lumster
"Why yes, I am... I would say that any religious group that prays to the dead in direct contravention of scripture and then ascribes miracle cures to that dead person would in fact be guilty of idolatry"

Well then you are not talking about the Catholic Church since what they do is according to Scripture. For example the bones of a Righteous man brought a man back to life in the Old Testament. And as to praying for all souls than I suggest you read more of the Old Testament. Of course you may be missing a few books since every King James Version had several more books in the original. Those books were in everyone of my Families Old Family Bible by it is rare to find them in any KJV printed after 1885.

Do you want a link to prove it? I am just begging for you to ask for that. Not that it will change one thing. Some people see things the way they want to see them regardless of evidence.
102 posted on 03/14/2006 1:59:32 PM PST by iluvlucy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Scotswife

Do you really not see the difference in "praying to" and "praying for"?

I pray to Jesus for my family, friends, enemies, sometimes. I don't pray to Mary or any Pope or any other person or being for them to pray to Jesus for me. What is the point in having a personal relationship with Christ, if you have to go through another person to get to him?

He is MY savior, not because of something I or someone else did, but just because he loves me.


103 posted on 03/14/2006 1:59:38 PM PST by CherylBower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: tbird5

I question the Post's headline. I believe the Church requires a finding of miracle(s) result from the intercession of the one who would be canonized.

Of course the Pope himself did not perform the miracle; and the miracle itself, in any event, comes from God, not the saint.


104 posted on 03/14/2006 2:01:30 PM PST by Petronski (I love Cyborg!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Lumster
Anyone seeking healing should go directly to the Lord Jesus not a dead pope

So in a difficult time, you do not ask your friends, family, and other to offer prayers up on your behalf, in addition to praying yourself? It is the same concept.
105 posted on 03/14/2006 2:01:35 PM PST by MrBlueSky2005
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: MrBlueSky2005
This is no different than your or I praying for an ill family member or asking another person to offer prayers up

No different???? I'd say asking a living person for prayer is very different than asking a dead pope. Asking a living church elder for prayer is proper (James 5:14) Seeking the assistance of the dead on any way is forbidden (Deut 18:11)

Again I say you guys need to read your bible for yourself instead of depending on "the teaching" of your apostate leaders. They are leading all of you to hell.
106 posted on 03/14/2006 2:01:59 PM PST by The Lumster (USA - where the innocent have nothing to fear!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: The Lumster

"It is amazing the lengths to which catholics will go in order to hold on to their idolatry."

You know, this is getting tiresome. Roman Catholics have a slightly different understanding of Christianity than you do. I have no idea what your denominational beliefs are, but they're different from those who are members of other denominations.

You may be a full-immersion Baptism guy. Someone else believes that sprinkling is adequate. Catholics baptise infants. Baptists require that baptismal candidates be of age.

So? You can quote a few verses of the Bible. So can I. So can anyone who has studied it.

Catholics are Christians. You, I assume, are also a Christian. Why call anyone names? It's unseemly. You share a basic belief in the same deity. You share a basic belief in Jesus as a savior. I can guarantee you that there are Christians who would find whatever group you happen to belong to to be in error.

Let it go. Worship as you choose and let others worship as they choose. Their worship is none of your affair.


107 posted on 03/14/2006 2:02:09 PM PST by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan; The Lumster

Good thing the worship of idols doesn't take place in the Catholic Church.


108 posted on 03/14/2006 2:02:55 PM PST by Petronski (I love Cyborg!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: tumblindice

The movie is called "Millions." Nice little film.


109 posted on 03/14/2006 2:03:30 PM PST by FreedomForce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
I'm betting they're going to say it's a miracle. The RCC desperately wants to canonize John Paul II. Myself, I'm not big on miracles.

For someone who is neither Catholic nor a believer in miracles, nor a believer in God, you sure jumped on this thread in a hurry.

I am constantly amazed by the fascination displayed by atheists for something they proclaim they don't believe in.
110 posted on 03/14/2006 2:04:00 PM PST by Antoninus (The only reason you're alive today is because your parents were pro-life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
If my glass of water becomes wine, by my taste test, then I'll call it a miracle. You just let me know where and when to show up.

See, I wasn't so much interested in *why* you don't believe in miracles, I was most interested in *what* would be a miracle to you and what that would do to your atheism?

I have no doubt you believe in nothing other than that you can see or touch. My point was to the millions of people of faith, they don't care if you can prove a "miracle" not a miracle. Their faith is all they need to believe in the miracle and the Church.

That's the part that fascinates me: why don't atheists see that people of faith don't really care what they believe? Folks attack you, not for proving the miracle ordinary, but for attacking their faith.

Personally I think you do realize that - which is why you do it.

111 posted on 03/14/2006 2:04:02 PM PST by VeniVidiVici (What? Me worry?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

No, you're right, it doesn't. I did not say that it did. I leave that to the Lumsters of this world. I understand the RCC's beliefs and know that it does not involve any idolatry.


112 posted on 03/14/2006 2:04:23 PM PST by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: tbird5

Most interesting.


113 posted on 03/14/2006 2:05:43 PM PST by TAdams8591
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Lumster
For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus;1Tim 2:5

Okay, then what about Matthew 2:13? Wasn't it an angel who appeared to Joseph rather than God directly? Didn't Gabriel appear to Mary?

If you're going to interpret 1Tim 2:5 so literally for your own purposes, then explaining away the appearance of angels who often acted as intermediaries between God and men is going to be pretty tough.

114 posted on 03/14/2006 2:06:03 PM PST by XJarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

"I am constantly amazed by the fascination displayed by atheists for something they proclaim they don't believe in."

My friend, why should I not be interested in an organization that has influenced history more than any other. Of course I'm interested in the Roman Catholic Church, specifically, and in Christianity in general.

Why are you amazed? I'm a history buff, with a specialized interest in the role that religion plays in history.


115 posted on 03/14/2006 2:06:11 PM PST by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: The Lumster; Petronski

Again I say you guys need to read your bible for yourself instead of depending on "the teaching" of your apostate leaders. They are leading all of you to hell.




I've almost had my fill of you.


116 posted on 03/14/2006 2:06:37 PM PST by onyx (IF ONLY 10% of Muslims are radical, that's still 120 MILLION who want to kill us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: The Lumster
Wanna bet?

If you are claiming that the Catholic Church teaches that saints perform miracles in their own right, then you are speaking falsely.

Check Commandment #8.
117 posted on 03/14/2006 2:06:43 PM PST by Antoninus (The only reason you're alive today is because your parents were pro-life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Labyrinthos
Saint Patrick was not a Catholic.

You cannot be serious. LOL

118 posted on 03/14/2006 2:07:15 PM PST by Petronski (I love Cyborg!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: iluvlucy
Of course you may be missing a few books since every King James Version had several more books in the original

Oh, I see.. the bible that we have is not reliable and only the catholics have the super secret version with all this other stuff in it that supports their idolatrous practices.

Gnosticism pure and simple
119 posted on 03/14/2006 2:07:29 PM PST by The Lumster (USA - where the innocent have nothing to fear!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: VeniVidiVici

"That's the part that fascinates me: why don't atheists see that people of faith don't really care what they believe? Folks attack you, not for proving the miracle ordinary, but for attacking their faith. "

I know that people believe in lots of things. I'm skeptical of "miracles." I'm especially skeptical of miraculous cures. I don't care what others believe, but I'm interested in what they believe.


120 posted on 03/14/2006 2:07:40 PM PST by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 201-214 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson