All these are but the schismatic garbage we're usually regaled by those outside the Church who insist, in their delusion, that the Church comes to them and not the other way around.
None of these articles are to be taken seriously.
-Theo
None of these articles are to be taken seriously.
To be sure, everyone, after spending months away from here and reading, I fully understand why the SSPX is schismatic. There are sedes who would agree with you on this.
However, it is also noted that one can go into schism via heresy. For example, one who says that contraception is permitted, the sacraments are not necessary for salvation, the Blessed Virgin Mary was conceived with original sin, etc., commits heresy and goes into schism for denying infallible Catholic dogmas, which are defined by. . . the Apostolic See.
By the way, I'm doing research on and off nowadays regarding the 1958 conclave and later events connected to it. There is enough evidence out there to prove that Cardinal Siri was elected as successor to Pope Pius XII and was known as Pope Gregory XVII, and a non-canonical election followed because a faction including closet masons and Communists (and sympathizers) were opposed to the result of the first.
I would not blame those who weren't aware of this, but are at least protecting the faithful from teachings foreign to Catholicism.