Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: bkj

Interesting post. Msgr. Parolin need not take the name of Peter as pope since his first name is already Peter. I disagree with the rest of the thinking however.

This pope, BXVI, was largely formed by the Benedictines. He spent some time in their monasteries although never officially became one. If anyone bothers to read his writings, his philosophy is distinctly Benedictine. He chose his name in honor of the order.

Petrus Romanus has been referred to in several prophecies apart from St. Malachy. There are two theories. The pope of Fatima prediction who flees Rome may be BVXI. That pope will die a cruel death after remaining in hiding for a short time. An anti-pope will take the throne in his place, someone not validly elected although the world will accept him (Mahony's man, Levada anyone??) At this point the prophecies diverge. Some state the remaining faithful bishops and cardinals of the world will secretly convene and elect a valid pope. Other prophecies state Heaven itself will chose Peter the Roman via the reappearance of Moses and Elijah.

The prophecies are apocalyptic at this point. We'll only know for certain when the time comes.


11 posted on 03/27/2006 12:00:31 PM PST by Canticle_of_Deborah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Canticle_of_Deborah

Dear Canticle,

Greatly appreciate your input. Some things there to think about, thank you.


16 posted on 03/29/2006 6:13:47 PM PST by bkj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson