Good. A point of inquiry - does that mean no personal attacks on the author of the article rather than a discussion of the contents?
You can attack the author (as long as it is not a Freeper) - and the content of the article, ideology, philosophy, history, doctrine etc. But personal attacks of other Freepers are not tolerable.
To me a personal attack is when you call the person an unkind name, but asking one to be fair, or try to be consistant in ones reasoning or the scheme of things is not an attack!
But than I never did have a secure handle on my use of the language!