The blood of Jesus Christ is just a talking point?
Well, chances are excellent that this yo-yo has taken it out-of-context and worded it to suit his own needs, which quite probably include milking this for as many $$$$ as he can. I listen to MacArthur daily, and I simply would never even think of lending an ear to heresy on a daily basis. The guy that wrote the article is just a bona fide-NUT! That's all...
Does it not give you pause to wonder why it is that the Catholics are praising you for posting this thread?
Perhaps if you read exactly what it was that MacArthur said instead of relying on those who attack him because they disagree with his soteriology. MacArthur is one of the best Bible teachers of the 20th Century. I suspect he will go down as one of the best of the 21st Century. When you see accusations against him for being heretical and you see the rabid Catholics jumping on the bandwagon, perhaps it is time to take pause and actually read what it is that MacArthur wrote rather than what other say he wrote.
He has made himself clear in post number 52. Why don't you address that post and let everyone know where he is being heretical there. That is his actual teaching on the subject.