Try reading Abp. Bugnini's "Reform of the Liturgy." In it, he specifically says penitential prayers were removed if they didn't agree with modern sensibilities.
Nice try defending the Neo-Lutheran Mass.
If you had read the article, you would have noticed that precisely this point is discussed.
Please do not insult the rite of our Churches with a silly adjective like "neo-Lutheran." This criticism doesn't even make sense. Luther had no problem with the doctrine of Hell and he retained the traditional lectionary.
Traditionalist criticisms of the new lectionary, which happens to be one of the best aspects of the reformed liturgy, as 'soft' on the Catholic doctrine of Hell are just incorrect, as Fr. Harrison has shown quite well in this article. I don't see why you bother posting if you aren't interested in engaging substantially with the article/topic, but you obviously can't do that if you don't even bother reading it.