Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Petronski

>> False dichotomy! The real question is, did she choose to play this character so as to express her views of the Pope? <<

True. But since we know absolutely nothing of the character, we have no basis for supposing which. Although I'll retract my comments about how bad the posting of the article was, at least for now, the article remains one of the most pathetically lame things I've ever read. NewsMax or the Boston Phoenix would shun that turd.


61 posted on 07/19/2006 9:09:11 AM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: dangus
Poorly written, perhaps, but not inaccurate it seems.

...we have no basis for supposing which.

You don't. Everyone else seems to understand what her behavior here means.

64 posted on 07/19/2006 9:17:48 AM PDT by Petronski (Living His life abundantly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

To: dangus

I can understand your disappointment at Charlotte's fall from grace, and your gallant attempts to defend her here.

I had he same sort of feelings, decades ago, when the gorgeous Ingrid Bergman, who portrayed a beatific nun in "Going My Way", had a child out of wedlock. I was stunned.

So often we confuse the human being with the lovely image on stage or screen.


95 posted on 07/19/2006 12:21:00 PM PDT by Palladin (...onward to Mecca.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson