[A CA Guy]

Makes no sense, somehow mostly men called of God did not make it to serve the church but a bunch of gays did?

Bunk IMO.

I believe the levels of abuses are currently at 25% of the level found in the public, but you listen to this article and the church is made to sound like a gay pride parade.

[Iscool]

Makes no sense, somehow mostly men called of God did not make it to serve the church but a bunch of gays did?

Creates a bit of a dilema I'd say...Did it ever occur to you that God is perhaps NOT calling single men to the church???

Regardless, one would have to admit that an all male seminary along with an all male vocation would be a magnet for queers...Just as is the military...And of course we all know how the queer association got severely offended when the people decided we no longer wanted queers leading our boyscouts...

In my view, it would be wise to do some sort of check on all seminary students as well as faculty to try to derermine their sexual preference...One might wonder if young queer men are not recruited into the seminaries...

Of course it would be hard to determine a male's 'private leanings' when one is required to swear off women...

[dsc]

"Makes no sense, somehow mostly men called of God did not make it to serve the church but a bunch of gays did? Bunk IMO."

Read "Goodbye, Good Men."