[Eagle Eye]

Ironically the Final Authority section omits the Bible!

But then again, "trinity" is un-Biblical, can't be found there, and is a demonic inspired doctrine spread by men that denies that Christ came in the flesh.

[Krista33]

Omits the bible? I'm sure scripture was involved in all of the councils...

[Teófilo]

But then again, "trinity" is un-Biblical, can't be found there, and is a demonic inspired doctrine spread by men that denies that Christ came in the flesh.

Those who deny the Tri-Unity of God can't understand, much less explain, even less experience, how God is Love.

-Theo

[Diego1618]

Ironically the Final Authority section omits the Bible!

Why am I not surprised? Wouldn't it be great to have a "make it up as you go along religion" and then declare everyone a heretic who didn't agree with you.

But then again, "trinity" is un-Biblical, can't be found there, and is a demonic inspired doctrine spread by men that denies that Christ came in the flesh."

As you yourself have said....."to support the idea of a 3 in 1 Godhead you must use terms not found in the Bible, rely on false scripture and twisted interpretations that contradict extremely clear scripture and create a convoluted theory that no one really understands......forcing its adherents to declare it a mystery.

[Conservative til I die]

But then again, "trinity" is un-Biblical, can't be found there, and is a demonic inspired doctrine spread by men that denies that Christ came in the flesh.

Are you serious? John 1:1 calls Jesus God. You might be able to make a reasonable case against the Holy Spirt as God as it's more implied, though in several instances He is put on an equal plane as the Father and the Son (Go and baptize...in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit or Paul's greetings in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit).

But are you saying Trinitarians deny Christ came in the flesh? I don't get this, seriosuly.