Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: topcat54
??? Is this some sort of willful diversion from the facts in the case?

If you re-define enough words, you might be able to exonerate Bill Clinton, too. I am tired of the sciptural lambada, topcat. I don't think it was meant for it to be this hard to understand the word. Daniel and Revelation are supposed to be hard, 3 days and 3 nights ain't hard.

284 posted on 08/20/2006 4:56:13 PM PDT by kerryusama04 (Isa 8:20, Eze 22:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies ]


To: kerryusama04; Diego1618; ScubieNuc; DouglasKC; XeniaSt
3 days and 3 nights ain't hard.

I'm sorry that neither careful exegesis from the word of God nor the words of other competent scholars can convince you that your personal theology on this matter is in error, and that the Sunday resurrection is not a work of the antichrist, as you seem to think.

It is firmly grounded in the word of God and has been taught as being the truth since the very first century. nouveau theologies such as that put forward by goups like the SDA, Messianic Judaism, etc cannot change the truth of the word of God. They are the ones in confusion who attempt to change His word to suit these theologies.

My prayer for you is that one day you will see that too.

"We keep the eighth day [Sunday] with joyfulness, the day also on which Jesus rose again from the dead" (The Epistle of Barnabas, AD100).

285 posted on 08/20/2006 6:01:37 PM PDT by topcat54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson