[annalex]

I think the article misses the point of the Guide. It is supposed to be a simple aid in narrowing down the choices. It correctly informs the voter that abortion (for example) is an intrinsic evil, when war (also for example) is something that requires further discernment.

Our enemies would like nothing better than to put the Catholic voter back on the Democrat party reservation.

[Tax-chick]

a politician who proclaims his agreement with Catholic morality on the five issues listed above may then inaugurate any war with however flimsy a pretext

Is this person American? He thinks a Congressman or State Senator "may inaugurate any war" ... how?

Karl Rove wasn't even elected!

[jobim]

As the poster, what do you think?

Why attack Catholic Answers for its attempt to clarify issues? Does Storck wish to help Catholics to make moral choices, or does he have a bone to pick with Catholic Answers? Is his stance comparable to Dale Vree's at NOR?

[ArrogantBustard]

The author appears to be grasping for an excuse to vote for pro-abortion, pro-embryonic-stem-cell-research, pro-euthanasia, pro-sodomy, pro-cloning politicians, because they also happen to be pacifists.

[BlessedBeGod]

Sounds like this guy is trying to make an excuse for voting Democrat.

[G Larry]

The article misleads in it's attempt to equivicate.

In claiming a "flimsy" basis for going to war it ignores a host of facts.

The Catholic Answers Voters Guide is solid, the rebuttal is not!