[bornacatholic]

Yep. The Satan Sired SSPX hates the Church. That bastard child of Demonic Lineage, slithering in the sulphuric slime towards eternal perdition, hisses and strikes at the Body of Christ while trying to justify its evil by claiming the Body it strikes at is infected with modernism.

The sspx is no different than Luther, and Calvin and all the other enemies of Christ and His Church.

And only a soi disdant trad could claim evil good.

There has NEVER been a time in the entire history of Holy Mother Church, NOT ONE DAY, where a schism has been defended by members of the Body of Christ. In indetifying with the sspx, in supporting it, one identifes they are outside the Chruch and they must prepare themselves to suffer the consequences of dying Extra Ecclesian Nulla Salus.

[dsc]

"In indetifying with the sspx, in supporting it, one identifes they are outside the Chruch and they must prepare themselves to suffer the consequences of dying Extra Ecclesian Nulla Salus."

I don't usually comment on spelling, but I think the typos and grammatical errors above indicate that you are just a bit unhinged over this subject.

I hope you will seek more perspective and less emotion. Otherwise, when this whole thing is shown to be just the opposite of what you think it is, it's going to be quite a shock.

[OLD REGGIE]

There has NEVER been a time in the entire history of Holy Mother Church, NOT ONE DAY, where a schism has been defended by members of the Body of Christ.

I realize there is a distinction between "defended" and "accepted"; however, isn't the acceptance of the Eastern Orthodox Churches tantamount to defense of the schism?

Certainly the Eastern Churches, which certainly are members of the Body of Christ, defend the schism. No?