That's fine. So how should Genesis 1:26 read. Post your opinion of how it should read, if you have the guts.
I've taken EVERY ONE of you on and demolished your reasonings without any decent response from any of you save one.
I've had to deal with one of your group who doesn't even recognize it when he directly, clearly and word for word contradicts the Bible.
You are still showing significant flaws in fundamental study techniques by failing to focus on the clear verses and build from there, instead preferring sometimes flawed verses that support your theology.
God is spirit, invisible, not a man, not a son of man, not susceptible to temptation. There is only one God and God is one.
Jesus was/is a man, visible, frequently called son of man and son of God. Jesus came in the flesh and is the only mediator between man and God.
God called Jesus his son. Jesus called himself God's son. Peter, Paul, the centurian and many others there at the time called Jesus the son of God.
God is not a man; Jesus is. Jesus is not a god.
Terms like trinity, God the Son, God the Holy Spirit, three in one, triune, etc do not exist in the Bible and are unBiblical.
So in order to still believe in and promote the trinity you have to use unBiblical terms and concepts, rely on flawed texts, misinterpret scripture, and ignore dozens if not hundreds of clear scripture that is perfectly in context.
Then on a personal note, you didn't have the courage to look up a couple items yet you have the nerve to place a dare at my feet....you are pitiful.