To: Campion
Because Church documents were never translated into the vulgar tongues for dissemination into the laity, of course.
Anyway, I've pretty much conceded the etymological point. Perhaps you'd like to concede my point about moving the date and changing the customs/commands?
153 posted on
04/03/2007 3:08:44 PM PDT by
Buggman
(http://brit-chadasha.blogspot.com)
To: Buggman
Because Church documents were never translated into the vulgar tongues for dissemination into the laity Who wouldn't have known what to do with them, since they were illiterate.
Perhaps you'd like to concede my point about moving the date and changing the customs/commands?
Obviously the date was controversial, and the 14th of Nisan party lost the argument.
167 posted on
04/03/2007 7:09:59 PM PDT by
Campion
("I am so tired of you, liberal church in America" -- Mother Angelica, 1993)
To: Buggman
read Acts. change was the order of the day. did Christians need to be circumcised?
171 posted on
04/03/2007 7:26:03 PM PDT by
kawaii
(Orthodox Christianity -- Proclaiming the Truth Since 33 A.D.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson