[xzins]

Although this author is amillennial, he raises some interesting concerns about preterism and reconstruction.

[topcat54]

Although this author is amillennial, ..

So we already know he spiritualizes *everything*. Right? Why should his perspective be trusted?

Or is this a case of "any enemy of my enemy is my friend"?

[Alex Murphy]

Although this author is amillennial, he raises some interesting concerns about preterism and reconstruction.

Besides attempting to paint all postmillennialists as consistent, i.e. heretical "full" preterists who deny a literal, future Second Coming - despite all claims to the contrary - what other concerns does he raise?

Englesma, whom I normally have great respect for, muddles the water by falsely charging Reconstructionists with a belief that "Christ would come in the second coming within a few years, that is, in the destruction of Jerusalem in A.D. 70", Englesma IMO is deliberately confusing his opponents' view of His "coming in the clouds" (the judgment of Israel) with His Second Coming, i.e. His literal return. No Reconstructionist work I have ever read has ever proposed that the two "comings" are the same event.

[blue-duncan]

Tut, tut, tut. And you a man of the cloth. You are beginning to act like a lawyer. Let’s see now, from all the threads on eschatology and systems of theology.

All Dispensationalists are Dispensational.
All Pre Millennials are Pre Millennial.
All Pre tribs are Pre trib.
All Post Millennials are Post Millennial.
All Amillennials are Amillennial.
All Preterists are Preterist.