[xzins]

The return you posit does not match a grammatical, historical, or literary reading of the text.

[topcat54]

Seeing that HarleyD, Matchett-PI, I and others have done a more than adequate job refuting your raw assertions, it would behoove you to actually take up your Bible any demonstrate conclusively and clearly why we are wrong any you are right.

Of course any attgempt to do so with immediately demonstrate the inherent weakness of your position since you would actually have to deal with the text and related texts, e.g., “Assuredly, I say to you, there are some standing here who shall not taste death till they see the Son of Man coming in His kingdom." (Matt. 16:28)

Constantly saying "nay nay" doesn’t cut the mustard.

[Frumanchu]

The return you posit does not match a grammatical, historical, or literary reading of the text.

PROVE IT, x. Stop simply making generalized and unsupported statements like this and put you money where your mouth is.

[HarleyD]

The return you posit does not match a grammatical, historical, or literary reading of the text.

If that's the case people wouldn't have been arguing about this for 2000 years. Oops excuse me. I guess dispensationalists have only be around for 150 years, and even then in small minorities.