Replies

Who appointed Rome his savior?

The man may have had an intellectual consent to salvation by faith, but he never had a saving faith.You see his indecision in some of the waffling he does .

As to who called me to be his judge... the word of God

2Cr 6:14 Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness?
2Cr 6:15 And what concord hath Christ with Belial? or what part hath he that believeth with an infidel?

Eph 5:11 And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove [them].
Eph 5:12 For it is a shame even to speak of those things which are done of them in secret.
Eph 5:13 But all things that are reproved are made manifest by the light: for whatsoever doth make manifest is light.

2Th 3:6 Now we command you, brethren, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that ye withdraw yourselves from every brother that walketh disorderly, and not after the tradition which he received of us.

As to who called me to be his judge... the word of God

You need to read your Bible more carefully, then.

I think it's amusing that, on the one hand, you've condemned Dr. Beckwith to hell ...

while, on the other hand, you incorrectly accuse Trent of doing the same to the "reformers" and object to that and call it "hatred".

Right here, on the same thread, and you don't even see the breathtaking double standard that you're embracing. It's okay for you to damn Dr. Beckwith, but wrong for Trent to "damn" John Calvin?

If what Trent did is "hatred," then what you're doing is precisely the same.

LOL.

One other thing: To Catholics who say that the “anathemas” of Trent (or any other General Council) are somehow no longer in force: not so! Any doctrine that has been declared by a General Council with an “anathema” attached to its denial, is binding on the faithful for all time. But this nonsense about
‘anathema sit’ meaning “he is damned” is nonsense.

ETH: I must have missed the post where someone actually Catholic suggested that we Catholics are in need of your "reformed" opinions as to what we ought to believe or how we ought to conduct the internal governance of our Faith. Where was that?

Not that I intend to accommodate you by prolonging the exchange but each and every Scriptural citation in your #21 can be used against your position by Catholics as easily or more so than you use each of them in apparent advancement of the "reform."